Jodi Arias Trial: Jury Deciding Arias' Fate; Announcement to Come in Hour or Less After Jury Makes Decision

ariasjodisepia.jpg
Jodi Arias and the rest of the world soon will find out what the jury thinks about the June 2008 slaying of Mesa resident Travis Alexander.
The jury in the Jodi Arias murder trial huddled at 9 a.m. this morning on its big decision following about an hour of deliberations on Friday.

The panel's decision will be announced about an hour or less after it's made, court staff tells us this morning. Whether individual jury members feel Arias deserves to be freed or executed for killing Travis Alexander, no doubt they're all ready to quit the temp job they began on January 2.

You don't have to twist our arm -- we'll give you our best guess as to what happens.

And, of course, we'd love to hear your prediction, so please feel free to take our poll at the end of this post.

See also: Psycho Killer: Jodi Arias' Kinky Death-Penalty Trial

ariasheadstand.JPG
No need to say too much about the closing arguments of the defense. Like much of Arias' attempts to convince the jury and the rest of the world that she had a good reason for killing Alexander, the excuses fell flat.

Judging from many of the tens of thousands of tweets from the past few days, many trial watchers believe Juan Martinez's closing arguments were brilliant. We wouldn't go that far, but it did seem he did set up the pins for an easy strike.

His closing arguments also had several fun flourishes (we used "The Count's" YouTube site to view the vids). For instance, when Martinez covers how Arias drove to Utah to visit Ryan Burns after mutilating and killing Alexander, he comments on what a "romantic" scene it must have been, and how "you could almost hear the violins" playing.

Naturally, Martinez focused on the evidence of premeditation. The jury instructions state (see below) that to find someone guilty of first degree premeditated murder, an unspecified period of time must elapse in which the defendant considers and reflects upon the murder about to be committed.

According to Martinez, the evidence clearly shows the premeditation began in late May 2008, when -- he says -- Arias stole the .25-caliber handgun from her grandparents that was likely used to shoot Alexander. But, in a point he'd made previously in the trial, the fact that Arias "killed" Alexander three separate times proves premeditation took place between each separate act.

Blood smears in the hallway showed that Alexander tried desperately to escape his attacker after she began stabbing him in the shower.

"She chases him down -- that's what she did," Martinez told the jury. "How many stab wounds has she already given him at that point?"

The first assault was followed by the "strike to kill right at the neck." There's no doubt that Arias sliced his neck from ear to ear, and the act itself is one in which the attacker would have known would be fatal to the victim, Martinez argued.

Prosecutor Juan Martinez

Then came the gunshot. Forensic science shows that the bullet punched through Alexander's face and tore through his brain -- a devastating fatal wound in and of itself. Alexander would not have been capable of fighting back after the shot to the head, as a medical examiner testified. Moreover, the autopsy showed the bullet track didn't cause any blood flow -- because Alexander was already dead when he was shot.

"She killed him three times over," Martinez insisted. "Is that enough premeditation?"

if the answer to that question is "yes," then jurors will find Arias guilty of first-degree murder.

They have other options:

* Felony murder, based on the idea that she was committing burglary by being in Alexander's house with the intention of committing a murder.

* Second-degree murder, which doesn't require proof of premeditation.

* Manslaughter, based on the idea of a heat-of-passion quarrel that resulted in a death.

* Self-defense. This is Arias' ultimate hope and what her entire defense was tailored around. She claims that Alexander, naked and dripping in the shower, attacked her because he was angry that she'd dropped her new camera. She ran into his closet and grabbed "his" gun. It fired. The next thing she remembered, she was driving in the desert, far from the murder scene. The self-defense story is her third account of her role in the murder.

Whether Arias receives the death sentence will be decided in a penalty phase of the trial.

We're still willing to get out on that limb and predict that Arias will be found guilty of first-degree murder and will be sentenced to death. As we've written, .25-caliber guns are not very popular. The gun stolen from the home in which Arias lived was a .25 caliber, and the bullet found in Alexander's head was a .25 caliber. The odds of those two facts not being related are beyond reasonable doubt, in our humble opinion. Because of that, the murder was obviously well-planned ahead of time -- and that's not even taking into account the evidence of the gas cans, the license plate and her dyed hair.

Take our poll and let us know how you think this will end:



Click here to read the final jury instructions in the Jodi Arias trial.

Check Valley Fever for updates.

My Voice Nation Help
8 comments
fishsns
fishsns

Unfortunately, our bleeding heart society/judicial system for women killers has proven non effective. Exactly how many women killers have been executed in since... let's say 2008? How many female sex offenders have been imprisoned proportionately to that of men? How many Casey Anthonys' are we going to see our hear about and watch, essentially, walk away scott free? When is our judicial system going to stop catering to our sissified society that thinks women kill for a more "emotional" reason? Am I right, or am I right?

Tommy_Collins
Tommy_Collins

I voted for the first choice, but honestly no one can possibly predict what a single juror can do to the process. The choice that was left out was for a hung jury resulting in mistrial, which is VERY possible. All it takes is for one juror to hold out for manslaughter (heat of passion defense) and the jury will hang. Imagine having to go through another trial of five months at 100% taxpayer expense on both sides of the courtroom.

In the meanwhile the very elderly local elected official is looking forward to seeing his name out in the public once again. It's only a matter of time before there's another raid, or threat to his life, or a student threatening another student, or it may be that he will just take advantage of more victims to call himself a victim, once again.

If she is acquitted I'm sure there is a spot for her as a member of one of the many posses.

shadeaux14
shadeaux14

You forgot to include,


WHO GIVES A RAT'S ASS?

JohnQ.Public
JohnQ.Public

I just can't wait for this to be over and done with.  What a sordid, sad little tale that has taken way, way too long to resolve. 

JohnQ.Public
JohnQ.Public

@shadeaux14 I do.  I give a big rat's ass.  Why?  The sooner the jury reaches a verdict the sooner we can stop hearing about it.  The sooner every national news network will put their "Arias Trial" lead-in graphic in the (virtual) trash and leave it there forever.  The sooner that people like Nancy Grace will stop pontificating about every little damn detail of it.  Just make it end.  MAKE IT END!

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Loading...