Dennis Burke Won't Prosecute Sheriff Arpaio or His Employees Over "Exorbitant" Extradition Costs

mcclures fishing.jpg

Extraditions performed by the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office were "inexplicably exorbitant" but not a criminal misuse of public funds, U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke has decided.

At the request of County Manager David Smith (see below), Burke's office conducted a review of how Sheriff Joe Arpaio's employees brought suspects to the Valley from locations all over the country. After looking at the situation for months, Burke's investigators concluded that no crime had occurred. That's not to say Burke thinks Arpaio's office spent money wisely.

The average cost of each extradition under Arpaio's watch was about $2,000 over the last several years, compared to about $344 in Pima County, Burke wrote in a June 22 letter to Smith (also below).

Burke's letter didn't address the $99 million misspent from the jail tax fund -- but mentioned investigators are still "diligently" looking into that and other allegations made by Smith.

 

 

County officials had rightfully complained that the extradition trips weren't performed with an eye toward saving money, and often included an extra day for the weary, traveling deputies to do a little fishing or other types of R&R.

We explored this issue last year while checking into the infamous SCA fundraising scandal.

New Times learned last year that the shady Sheriff's Command Association, a group of donors who secretly raised funds later used for ad to attack Arpaio's political opponent, Dan Saban, had met on a fishing trip in Alaska. We heard it was possible the county paid for the October 2006 trip, possibly as part of a faux extradition trip. It turned out we were wrong -- there really was an extradition during the suspected time-frame of the SCA trip. (It turned out, as we reported in our April story about the SCA scandal, that the SCA Alaska trip had really occurred in July of 2007.)

Yet paperwork showed that the MCSO made an awful lot of extradition trips to Alaska. In the October-November 2006 trip, a receipt showed how deputies had traveled all the way to the northlands to pick up a lowly car thief, staying two days at McClure's Rustic River Retreat at a cost of $204. Oddly, the owner told us that he doesn't offer use of his cabins in that time frame and probably referred the deputies somewhere else. The whole thing sounded, well, fishy.

Burke, in his letter, said the MCSO "employed an inexplicably exorbitant and baffingly unique option for extraditions," and had failed to protect taxpayer money.

Sheriff's officials did seem to use the extraditions for personal reasons, says county spokeswoman Cari Gerchick: "Certainly, the fishing trips raised eyebrows."

Yet Gerchick adds that they're "glad no crimes had been committed" and it's good that prisoners were picked up.

The county will help figure out ways to keep such expenses down in the future, she says.

One possible idea: When MCSO supervisors pack their bags for out-of-town extraditions, make sure they're not taking a tackle box.

 

Click here for the June 22 letter from Burke to Smith.

And here for the October 6, 2010 letter from Smith to Burke.

 

 

 

 

 

 

My Voice Nation Help
11 comments
Tommy Collins
Tommy Collins

["did not rise to an actionable criminal offense"]

This statement is a tongue in mouth legal statement which otherwise might have said (in lay terms), "Yeh, there were damn sure crimes involved, but we probably wouldn't win them in court and it's almost impossible to get a conviction on cops without video showing them stealing money from a cash register and a gun pointed at a victim".

The MCSO commanders involved would all say, "we're just doing what the shurf told us to do". The shurf says, "huh? Whadda ya mean? Huh? I don't know nothin, and if I did know nothin, which I don't, I wouldn't, so I can't say that I do, or didn't"

Seems our esteemed shurf grew up in the era and area of Whitey Bulger...

KPEGJER94
KPEGJER94

just what DOES constitute criminal mis-use of taxpayers money  ?????just what exactly happened here ??????  IS THE "GOOD OLE BOYS CLUB " STILL OPERATING HERE   ??????

Tommy Collins
Tommy Collins

Intent to deprive. Taking something of value without permission of the owner. The 'owner' is this case is literally Maricopa County and MCSO was being 'trusted' not to misuse the funds, thus it becomes more of a civil matter of mismanagement, than a criminal matter, unless of course one of the deputies booked a ticket and sold it to someone else and pocketed the money, or submitted fraudulent receipts and pocketed money, that kind of thing. Frustrating, isn't it?

Gerry_C
Gerry_C

Wow!  No criminal charges.  Arpaio can add on to his exceptionally good year in 2011. 

Tommy Collins
Tommy Collins

I think the U.S. Attorney cleared this case by "exceptional arrest", since it was MCSO and they are VERY familiar with the term. This doesn't mean that crimes didn't occur, he just doesn't see the need to prosecute them, rather he's throwing it back at the Board of Supervisors to do their job, which isn't going to happen soon with the Three Amigos (Wilson, Brock & Kunasek) at the wheel.

Not surprised
Not surprised

Seems justice and accountability for Arpaio in this matter now are in the hands of Maricopa County voters.

The primary is in August.  GET OUT AND VOTE!!!

Tommy Collins
Tommy Collins

Which primary is that? I think the Phoenix city election is in August, but the county elections (other than the upcoming state senate pearce recall) are not until 2012. I believe Phoenix elections are supposed to be non-partisan. At least in theory.

Not surprised
Not surprised

Sorry for the lack of clarity regarding the primary date....it's August 2012

GET OUT AND VOTE!!!

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Loading...