Arizona Republic Vilifies Photographer Looking to Cash in on Photo of 9-Year-Old Tucson Shooting Victim. We'll Play Devil's Advocate

Categories: Media, Schmedia
republicheader.jpg

The Arizona Republic ran a story on its website yesterday vilifying a Tucson photographer for trying to get the Gannett-owned newspaper -- and several other news outlets -- to cough up some (a lot of) cash for using a photo of a 9-year-old girl killed during the January 8, shooting rampage in Tucson, to which he owns the rights.

Defending a guy trying to cash in on tragedy is never easy, however, we'll do our best.

Photographer Jon Wolf owns the copyrights to several photos of Christina Green, the 9-year-old girl tragically killed by Jared Loughner in Tucson last month. One of those photos was distributed to the media by Green's family, and was used by at least 140 news outlets across the country. Wolf now wants to be compensated for the use of the image -- to the tune of $125,000, according to the Republic.

Because it appears that he's trying to profit on Green's death, according to the mainstream media, now he's the asshole -- despite offering to donate a portion of his earnings to a charity that helps grieving children and their families.

After learning that Wolf was trying to collect on the media's use of his work, the Green family has said they're furious he would do so. A Facebook group has been organized calling for a boycott of Wolf's business, and the Tucson charity, Tu Nidito, to which he offered to donate a portion of the money, has said it would not accept any donation from Wolf.

All because the guy wants to be compensated for his work, which is now worth a lot more than it was when he originally took the photo.

Granted, the circumstances that made his work at all valuable were beyond tragic. That said, is it wrong to sell a painting that's value has increased only because the artist who created it croaked?

In other words, regardless of how they became that way, the photos are valuable and Wolf is entitled to appropriate compensation -- maybe not the $125,000 he's asking for, but certainly more than the "standard licensing fee."

The bottom line is the photos belong to Wolf, and the press just helped itself to intellectual property it didn't own -- all so the media could cash in on the tragedy in its own right.

As the saying goes in the media biz, "if it bleeds, it leads." As sleazy as it sounds, the media relies on tragedy because it's what people are interested in, and on that tragic day in Tucson, the Arizona media said cha-ching!

Not to mention, if the Arizona Republic -- or any large-scale member of the fourth estate -- owned the rights to the photos of Green, and those photos were being circulated by other news outlets all over the world, without compensation, we can't imagine Gannett brass just letting it slide because something tragic happened

We contacted Wolf's studio for comment and were directed to a statement on his website, which you can see below.

For those who have been following the coverage of the story of Christina Green's portrait, the following was released to media outlets today.

My actions regarding this matter have been misunderstood and sadly mischaracterized. My intent from the beginning always has been to use the proceeds from my creative work to make a charitable donation in Christina Green's memory. I sought and received the Green family's approval to do so. At no time did I intend to profit personally from this tragedy. As a result of the mischaracterizations in the news coverage and the resulting community outcry, and in the hope of saving the Green family from further association with this matter, I have chosen to halt filing legal action in the hopes of reaching negotiated settlements with those that have used this image. I will turn the proceeds collected to date over to a charity in Christina's honor. I truly and deeply regret the additional distress this matter has placed on the Green family, and I apologize for that. - Jon Wolf

We left a message for Wolf to call us. We'll let you know if he returns the call.

My Voice Nation Help
7 comments
haihei
haihei

Dear customers, thank you for your support of our company.Here, there's good news to tell you: The company recentlylaunched a number of new fashion items! ! Fashionableand welcome everyone to come buy. If necessary,welcome to :===== www. soozone.com========

haihei
haihei

Dear customers, thank you for your support of our company.Here, there's good news to tell you: The company recentlylaunched a number of new fashion items! ! Fashionableand welcome everyone to come buy. If necessary,welcome to :===== www. soozone.com========T-shirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $14New era cap $10

Air jordan(1-24)shoes $30

Handbags(Coach,ed hardy,lv,d&g) $35

Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $35

Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini)$14

Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $18

Livinisez
Livinisez

Give us "Dirty Laundry" as Mr. Henley said so well. Pics of tradjedies have always drawn big bucks, what's the issue here?

Anon
Anon

<the "if="" --="" all="" and="" are="" arizona="" as="" because="" belong="" biz,="" bleeds,="" bottom="" cash="" cha-ching!="" could="" day="" didn't="" goes="" helped="" in="" in,="" intellectual="" interested="" is="" it="" it's="" its="" itself="" just="" leads."="" line="" media="" on="" own="" people="" photos="" press="" property="" relies="" right.="" said="" saying="" sleazy="" so="" sounds,="" that="" the="" to="" tragedy="" tragic="" tucson,="" what="" wolf,="">

The tragedy was horrific but the media has exploited it every way it could and profited from it. The portrait studios make it clear the photos they take are copyrighted. What is happening here is that the family had to get permission from the photographer and did not which would then put them in a position to be sued themselves. The photographer is NOT out of place, his artistic image, a beautiful one, just became "famous". it's just that the public is ignorant of an artist, a photographer, a writer who OWNS the copyright for their work. The media and many others have taken his image. They all owe him and they know it.</the>

Johnny White Man
Johnny White Man

Well I'm gonna side with Wolf on this one. He should get paid for his "work", whether its photography or otherwise. We all gotta paid for our services no matter what it is.(unless its volunteer, which it wasn't).So the other saying goes: "It's not a free ride".

botanybay
botanybay

The Republic knows darn well that even if they're handed a photo by the family, the photographer owns the copyright of the image (unless he has specifically signed-over the rights to them). Anyone who works in media or advertising knows this.

And so they should not act surprised when the photographer expects to be compensated for his work. They jacked his work, and they know it.

Domino
Domino

AZ Rebublic, All the channels, used this girl to make money why not him. The pot has called the kettle black again.

Now Trending

Phoenix Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...