39 comment(s) / Post a Comment
first, this case sets a precedence. That being that if a cop wants to further his career he can lie in a grand jury to get an indictment and it will stand, and if the cops and prosecutor think you did it you must have. Beyond a reasonable doubt is now just a phrase in a dictionary rather than part of the judicial system.
Im not saying this guy is an angel by any means, but ive noticed lately that that term just no longer exists period. Now i didnt hear the case in court, but i know a cop lied and got promoted because of the case..i know the deceased wrote suicide letters, and asked that he marry the younger girl. And i know that Thomas and his cronies will do anything to get the W...that said, i just dont see how they came to a conclusion that he caused her death beyond a reasonable doubt..
only in maricopa county, can this happen, it is not isolated case by any means, the mormons sticking together, nothing but a f---cult! what will they say when the truth comes out,?? how will they live with themselves, I hope every time they lay their head on their pillow they think of him in a prison. The threat to society, yep every calorie counter is a bad person. Wont bother ole andy he's just chalking up the votes.
The hausner case is a open and shut but how much money is being spent and how many months of trial, how much did the proseutors office spend on this trial?? to grand stand and show he is protecting the public and hard on crime, it is like a television ad we are paying for!! They could have saved us alot of money but he wanted a big public ta do, all at our expense.
POST the cops name here, actually this doesnt set presisence as it is the norm in Maricopa County. read Jingle Jangle how this county is breading grounds for curopt detectives cops, prosecutors and still goes on.!!!1 DOGJ DOJ !!!!
only in maricopa county, can this happen, it is not isolated case by any means, the mormons sticking together, nothing but a f---cult! what will they say when the truth comes out,?? how will they live with themselves, I hope every time they lay their head on their pillow they think of him in a prison. The threat to society, yep every calorie counter is a bad person. Wont bother ole andy he's just chalking up the votes.
The hausner case is a open and shut but how much money is being spent and how many months of trial, how much did the proseutors office spend on this trial?? to grand stand and show he is protecting the public and hard on crime, it is like a television ad we are paying for!! They could have saved us alot of money but he wanted a big public ta do, all at our expense.
POST the cops name here, actually this doesnt set presisence as it is the norm in Maricopa County. read Jingle Jangle how this county is breading grounds for curopt detectives cops, prosecutors and still goes on.!!!1 DOGJ DOJ !!!!
justice is elusive in Maricopa County. How many guilty people once they are sentenced cry, very sad, some day they will get theres the little hitlers of maricopa county---
Posted On: Wednesday, Mar. 25 2009 @ 11:20AMHe is lucky, he is a bad man! Got off easy for what he did. May he rot of guilt
Posted On: Wednesday, Mar. 25 2009 @ 12:07PMUP yours Rubin
my family says you hung out with his family throughout the whole case....
maybe you should tell your writers you like to hang out with murderers.
Austin Stradling
"Faylene's oldest"
yeah Austin, hes a real murderer..thats why she wrote several suicide letters, there was little to no conclusive evidence to convict, and even the medical examiner isnt sure. Could it be spite, revenge, and otehr alterior motives that the family seeks rather than justice? maybe im the only one who thinks this way, but unless it was a slam dunk case i know my conscience wouldnt sit well with me if i was happy that a potentially wrongfully convicted man was sent to prison. (better than joes jails though, where inmate deaths seem to be a weekly occurance). that said, i hope the family is thrilled and their vengence for him marrying again so quickly is fullfilled...nice of you to support a cop lying his ass off to get a promotion rather than the truth by the way....real stand up...
Posted On: Wednesday, Mar. 25 2009 @ 2:11PMThis is what happens when one puts their life in the hands of 12 people too stupid to get out of jury duty.
Honestly, those letters, the journal entries and a prior suicide attempt are 100% reasonable doubt. What a bunch of F-Tards.
Posted On: Thursday, Mar. 26 2009 @ 12:42AMWhat a difference between the Republic's news article and the New Times. I'm of the LDS faith and must admit I rolled my eyes when I read the sketchy details on Az Central Wednesday. Slam dunk, sez me. Guilty guilty guilty. Then I went to the New Times and spent a good part of the evening reading Paul Rubin's coverage of the whole situation. Sy Ray is a bad man, a very bad man.
Posted On: Thursday, Mar. 26 2009 @ 2:00AMAustin if you care so much how come you never once showed face in that court room?? its because you know deep in your heart he did not do this and that he loved your mother. Are you too fried and fadded to read your mothers letters? one can only hope carma comes back to kick the eves family in the ass for what they have done.
Posted On: Thursday, Mar. 26 2009 @ 11:12AMHey judge is a joke.... I usually don't reply to people on here, but I think I'm going to start with you.
Listen, I do care about my mom. But by showing up in court doesn't make a difference, my mother wants me to enjoy life, and be the best I can. The courtroom is nothing but negativity. I DO know in my heart that he did do this to my mom..... And no I'm not too fried and faded to read my mother's letters, I could smoke 4 pounds of pot and read straighter than your ass.....
Right now I live in San Diego, California and have bills, school, and loads of obligation..... My sister lost all of her credits at BYU from this case, by having to testify, etc.
And since you used profanity, great I can play that game too. Don't you motherfucking talk like you know what's up, I spent the last 8 years of my life knowing that he DID do it, HE's GUILTY of manslaughter, GET OVER IT. The Eaves (MY FAMILY) did NOTHING, this wasn't the Eaves vs. Grant, it was the State of dry card-board Hotter than my seatbelt in the Nazi Arizona sun vs. Grant.... I cared about my mom the most by NOT showing up for that fanitical religous mockery circus festival court hearing.
So you can take my "drug talk" and/or profantiy and start shit, stir things up because you prob live in AZ and are a fanactic but don't count on a reply again, because YOU were talking about my MOM, called me fried/faded, and told me I didn't care since I didn't show up. FUCK YOU
Posted On: Thursday, Mar. 26 2009 @ 11:48AMI am reading these post and think it is horrible the language being used for one thing and the implications being the other. Does any of us really know without a doubt what happened-I think not. I have followed the papers I live in a town near the convicted and I am of the LDS faith. All of these do not matter. I feel like bringing religion into it is wrong-he is a man and his religion did not cause or support any of this. I belive all of their children should be left alone-they have gone through more than any child should ever go through. As for the judicial system it is what it is and we need to have faith in it, it is not fool proof. To the person that said there were 12 people not smart enough to get out of jury duty-I hope you never need a fair jury on your side-you should be ashamed of yourself-it is a duty as american to be willing to be a part of this and it is a privelege you have because you are American.
Posted On: Thursday, Mar. 26 2009 @ 3:15PM..why is there always an excuse----religion, unfair jury, bad judge, crooked cops-take personal responsibility for actions-leave the kids out of it and face the consequences for actions!!
Austin don't lower yourself to anyone elses level by responding to those negative accusations.
This has been a long drawn out case and I feel horrible for all that your family has endured.
I am glad it is over and you can have some peace.
I completely agree with Bystander on BOTH posts. Austin, your choice of how to handle this tragedy is nobody's business. Don't worry about what people say. You may face a lot of contentious people try to rope you into a power struggle for a verbal battle. But, stay out of the ring, Dude. There's a whole bunch of us willing to fight it for ya. Be there for those little brothers, and make peace wherever you go. That's how your mom would want it.
Take care.
To Ms.Southwell, your ignorance is dangerous! I know the people of the Mormon faith very well. Although I am not one, I respect them and this trial was NOT about religion, and they did not 'stick together' on this either. Both sides had plenty of them. I know Doug and I know Faylene's family....very well. They are all good at heart. Yes, Doug is VERY egotistical and Faylene's family are VERY pias but the fact remains that there are so many dynamics that caused this horrible thing to occur. Doug's desire to become famous and his unfaithfulness to his wives, his ridiculous actions (re-marriage) so soon after Faylene's death, The Eaves desire for vengance and the need for there to be some form of accountability for their suicidal daughter's "untimely" death. There is so much s--- in the way of the actual truth due to the reputations, hatred, resentment, competitions, egos....of everyone from the accused and family to the cop and legal "professionals" that is impossible for this mess to fair. Doug may be all the things his reputation says but....he is also a kind hearted man who has done many things for people without any expectations. He was irresponsible, I agree. But never in a million years will I believe he did anything to cause or facilitate Faylene's death in any way.
The moron cop is the one who should be humng out to dry for all the lies he has told as well as his "sins of ommision". What an ass. Imagine him showing up when you need help...
This has been a very interesting story for me because I never knew Grant but have had lots of coversations with people on both sides of this case. When Falene died I was told her friends immediately knew she had been murdered because she had told one of them when they went to visit her that she thought Doug had pushed her. they went to the DA and begged them to look further into this case. It wasn't another "mormon conspiracy" I know a Dr. that dealt with him personally and he feels sure he was guilty. My point is this: obviously it wasn't just one "lying cop" and the argument that he couldn't do this because he loves his parents is about the lamest thing I've heard in his defense. Just about every murderer has a family member or friend that would stand up and defend them but the fact is a person can have good in them and still do very evil things. Personally I don't buy his story. He had enough knowledge(his back ground in the medical profession) to know you don't give a person with head injuries drugs(procured from his friend with out a prescription)and leave her alone in the bath tub. duh.
Posted On: Thursday, Mar. 26 2009 @ 10:48PMDoug Knows EXACTLY what he did and he Knows he got off easy.
I APPLAUD Austin for what he wrote! LOVED IT!!! Sometimes you just have to stand up for yourself, the people you love, and what you KNOW to be true.
More power to you, Austin! I wish you would reply more.!
I am sorry for Austin and his sister and family. I am sorry for Doug's mother and family because their hearts are broken too. When you have children you never dream that anything like this could happen. Austin is right. His mother WOULD NOT want him to have to experience that very public trial, when he lived with the nightmare everyday and still is living it. What loving mother would ever wish this on her children? It has literally consumed his life. How could it not? How horrible for Faylene's children to have to grow up with this hanging over their heads Can you imagine? I cannot. I work for the courts. I have for 20 years. I know the system inside out and i know that nobdy wins in these matters. NOBODY. It is a circus, especially when you have a high profile case like this was. When I heard about it years ago I knew in my heart that Doug did it and I was sick for the kids because they were the ones who lost the most. I don't know Faylene or her family but I am as mormon as you can get. Mormons value family above all. A mother's love is the most important thing you can give a child. I know that the religous conotations that were attached to this case, those letters, all of it was nothing but sensational garbage and lies. Mormons do not believe in suicide. It is a sin to kill yourself. The God I love does not appear to us and tell us to kill ourselves so that someone else can take your place and raise your children and live with your husband. She was obviously devout and spiritual,but she was also obviously troubled and she was manipulated by a master. A man so vile that he saw her weaknesses and delusions and built upon them and used them for his own evil plot. He is a liar, a murderer and a child abuser. What worse form of abuse than to kill your children's mother? Oh he will pay according to the laws of this land but he is facing much worse on the other side. But what punishment is ever going to make anyone feel better? There is nothing to be done about her death. Nothing is going to change. Nothing can fix this one folks. People can only hide behind their religion for so long In the end we all will have to face the music. I hope that all of the excitement about this awful tragedy will quickly fade so that Austin and his family can again have privacy so they can grieve in private, so they can heal in private and so they can go on with their lives and look forward to the day, a lifetime away, when they look upon their mother's face and tell her they love her. Leave this be. Let it go. I am half ashamed of myself for this blog because it isn't my business or anyone's business. Those who have suffered through this deserve their privacy. They deserve their own time to deal with this without anyone's comments or opinions. They are the only ones who know how they feel and we should leave them alone and offer prayers for blessings upon their lives. I hope you have a good life Austin. I am sorry for your loss. I cannot know what you have endured bedause I have never experienced loss like this. I knew Doug and his family, went to school with his brother and sister, so I guess I feel like that justifies my butting in. I am so sorry that you had to deal with this. It is so sad.
Posted On: Friday, Mar. 27 2009 @ 5:30PMLyn,
First off, if you don't like the language, too bad. Swearing if free speech, which "is a privelege* you have because you are American." (*not my spelling). If you don't want to be hit by a train, don't walk on the tracks.
Secondly, civic responsibility is indeed a privilege, but not an obligation. Honestly, what dim bulb would not intentionally discount themselves given the prosecution told them it could be 6 months or more? This is Andy Warholism.
Austin,
I know you dude and you probably have smoked >40 lbs. of weed in your lifetime. Further, if you want to learn about religious fanaticism, Mel McDonald has some letters and journals for you to read. Those and comments from most Mormons on this and other websites make mockery just to damn easy.
I knew Faylene and Doug before they got married and I know Faylene would NEVER kill herself knowing she would never be with her kids again!!!! Doug is GUILTY.
Posted On: Friday, Mar. 27 2009 @ 8:44PMI know with out a doubt that Doug is innocent. Faylene was very sick, beyond what anyone realized. Her own parents, sisters, & family are just as much to blame for what happened. Some day they will pay a price for all they have done to their own grandkids. I will always love and support Doug and fight for his innocence any way I can. I know he is NOT GUILTY.
Posted On: Monday, Mar. 30 2009 @ 10:31PMAustin,
Good for you. Live your life, I only hope someday your brothers will be free and not miserable. I did not know your mom, but feel that I have got to know her in my Blog on Google. As far as Doug, I have always believed he did it. I think Doug has a good family, and I feel for them but he is definately ruled by another kind of evil.
I still have my suspects about what Hilary really knows. What is your opinion on that?
Juan Martinez should be applauded. He is one awesome prosecutor. I didn't think they would get a conviction in a million years, but he did it.
Posted On: Thursday, Apr. 2 2009 @ 12:18PMI like how Arizona cops and judges are all corupt idiots. Doug Grant couldn't even look anyone in the eyes he had a guilty consciene. Doug was cheaten while he was married and how before she did pass away she accidently falls off a cliff. Why in the world would he call a Doctor to come check out his wife instead of rushing her to the hospital or calling for EMS. There are things for both sides to comeplain they have been wronged, but a jury decided. It was not the police, not the judge, not the District attorney, there must have been enough evidence. I have been to many trials and I have never been to one were people would decide that another is guilty just because. Most jurors put themselves in the defendants position.
Posted On: Friday, Apr. 3 2009 @ 6:45AMAfter watching the 20/20 version of the Doug Grant case, it certainly left a nasty tone about Mormons. As a Latter-day Saint, I found the story of Grant full of many flaws. For one, he testified that following his tryst with Hilary and the phone conversation with Faylene, he went to the Temple. I find that part of his story ridiculous because he would have had to have had a bishop's "recommend" to get passed the front door of any Mormon temple. To receive the "recommend" (a signed "license"), Grant would have had to have been "worthy" morally, which he admitted he was not. Obviously, Faylene divorced Grant for his previous immorality during their marriage, and it stands to reason that after that he would have either been excommunicated or at the very least disfellowshipped, which in both instances would have resulted in his forfeiture of his temple recommend, if he had had one in the first place. Being a member of the LDS Church does not automatically provide access to any Mormon temple. One must undergo a very detailed interview by both one's local bishop and stake president. I cannot believe Grant did either. In addition, I found his alligator tears on camera worthy of an Academy Award performance. Likewise, Faylene and Hilary came across as complete kooks. I hope no one judges Mormonism by their behaviors and beliefs, which in no way represent what the Mormon Church teaches. I find the radicals in Colorado City more credible and believable than any of those connected with this case.
Posted On: Saturday, Apr. 4 2009 @ 1:57PMHave no fear! Doug did not say he went to attend the Temple. He said that he and his 2 little boys got on a plane to San Diego to meet Faylene AT the Temple(grounds) so he could look her in the eyes. He wouldn't have taken the boys if he was going into the Temple. Doug had been excommunicated. He could NOT go INTO the Temple.
I just thought I would ease your mind. :)
I went to school with this spoiled brat. He was an ass in school and is a bigger one for what he did. If he was tried is Graham County where he is from he would not have been convicted at all. All those Mormons stick together.
Posted On: Friday, Apr. 10 2009 @ 10:28PMFaylene was a 'mormon' in better standing with the church than Doug was (if she had a temple recommend and he didn't) so what makes you think 'mormons' would stick up for Doug and not her. If Doug was excommunicated, technically he isn't even a 'mormon' anyway. and it seems to me that because of ignorant people steriotyping 'mormons', they kind of have to stick together to some degree. Just like you stick with you're people against them, no matter the situation, but just because their 'mormon' and you're not. I don't care whether you're black or white, male or female, christian or muslim, tall or short, but if you're just plain stupid don't post a comment. . . and by the way, they're members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. If you don't like em, fine, but get the name right.
Posted On: Saturday, Apr. 11 2009 @ 10:01PMThe defense attorney, Mel McDonald, literally took years off his own life in trying this case. His dedication to this client was superhuman. The 20/20 piece was limited by time. Given that limitation, they couldn't possibly explore the myriad ways in which the prosecutor and judge seemingly colluded to hamstring the defense. The procedural and judicial details of this case, if reviewed in an objective milieu, would almost certainly rise to the level of criminal malfeasance.
The outcome for all involved has been tragic; the outcome for citizens of Arizona is nothing short of catastrophic. History will look upon this era of malignant prosecutorial misconduct and deliberate judicial indifference with unflinching disdain. When the pendulum swings back toward individual liberties and presumption of innocence these men and women will likely be exposed as criminals. The defense of, "I was only following orders, working within the system, etc…" has historically rung hollow.
If the current foray into retroactive criminalization of executive/municipal conduct (Attorney General Holder considering domestic prosecution of Bush administration officials and avowals of cooperation with Spanish courts in criminal prosecution of Bush appointees) is a bell-weather for future events, the detective, the judge and the prosecutor in this case should not delude themselves with anything near to a feeling of security from future legal retribution. But until that pendulum swings back, until an overwhelming ground swell of indignation corrects the system, then each of us will be just one Sy Ray, just one Juan Martinez away from prison.
As the numbers of these apparently unjust cases mount, advancement-motivated detectives and prosecutors will be continuously emboldened and insentivized to convict at all costs. In the consequence-free environment we have established for our judiciary, there is no natural check or balance to the powers of the prosecution. You have the unfathomable powers of the State aligned on one side in the form of the police, the judge, and the prosecutor against which the defense, on the opposite side, relies solely upon the citizen's private means to investigate and hire counsel. This extreme mutation from the originally intended criminal justice system cannot possibly persist in a free society. Pervasive and obscene injustice within the criminal prosecution system has been an unfortunately and silently endured reality for the poor and under-represented for decades, commencing in earnest with the "drug war" legislation of the 80's. But now the emboldened and inured prosecutorial (persecutorial?) system has begun to practice its ministrations upon more mainstream and well-resourced members of society and the early signs of an impending reckoning are nascent.
The Duke Lacrosse case is the most highly publicized recent example of criminal prosecutorial malfeasance, but the general public may have missed the point in that circumstance. The media chose to portray the prosecutor in that case as a rogue wing-nut with a vendetta against jocks. That portrayal provides a pat scenario and a scary story that can be dramatically unwound over the course of 60-minute special broadcast, but the truth is far more terrifying. The Duke case was extraordinary not because of the actions of the prosecutor; he was painting by the numbers, using the standard prosecutorial playbook for high-profile (potentially career advancing) cases. No, the Duke case was extraordinary because the prosecution attempted to perform its standard practice upon a group of well-funded, reasonably well-connected young men with the means to reveal the truth independent of the court's and prosecution's manipulations. The case starkly and horrifyingly revealed the destructive potential of unbalanced prosecutorial power and interestingly demonstrated the evolution of an axiom: It has long been held that "wealth and power can secure an innocent verdict for a guilty man". The Duke case showed us that when the awesome powers of the State are aligned now "an innocent man requires wealth and power to avoid a guilty verdict."
Unfortunately for all involved in this case even one of the best defense attorneys in Arizona could not overcome the deliberate misconduct of the detectives, the pusilanimous prevaricating of the prosecution and the gigantic judicial tilt of the field.
Posted On: Wednesday, Apr. 29 2009 @ 5:45PMBottomline: The prosecution failed to prove its case but the jury felt terrible for the family and couldn't understand why a "good" husband wouldn't call 911 for his dying wife. It was easier for them in their compassion to forget the panic element and imagine a "bad" husband, whom they thought was probably cheating and probably would have an easier time of it if his wife were out of the picture, simply facilitated a situation whereby the wife might die. They're basically going to send a man, whom many perceive as "slick", to prison for 14 years for adultery. With that as the standard, Bill Clinton should be getting out of prison in about 3 years.
Posted On: Wednesday, Apr. 29 2009 @ 5:49PMTalk about clear as mud!
This case in no way is conclusive about ANYTHING. And I think that was what Rubin set out to show in his articles. I don't think his writing was pro- or anti-Doug Grant OR Faylene Grant. He did shake a mighty stick against Ray, and should have made clear that, as Ray himself said, hey, all's fair in obtaining info in an investigation, including lying to suspects. Ray apparently did a lot more than that - anyone thinking lynch cop here? -- and that IS a concern to ALL citizens, guilty or not. I for one wouldn't want that guy representing my neighborhood.
On another note, with regard to posts to the person claiming to be Faylene's eldest son Austin - never good form to respond harshly to a victim's pain. He is entitled to his opinion.
All-in-all, the whole story paints a helluva take on what happens when your life gets a little, uh, "out there." Doesn't take a degree in psychology to diagnose Doug Grant as a MAJOR narcissist. Doesn't mean he's a murderer, but dayum, he sure left himself wide open for speculation. Hedonism and stupidity alone aren't crimes that I know of, but this case makes ya wonder why the hell not.
I'm wondering why I've not yet run across the suggestion that ole Grant didn't plant a lot of Faylene's morbid fascinations. Certainly, history shows us that religions of ALL kinds have fanaticisms, add that to a narcissistic husband and an environment of people who just did not appear to think it odd at all that the whole family is talking about imminent death as if it were in the horoscope section of their newspaper. "Oh, it says here that I'm going to die today. Huh. Hey, honey, how about that neighbor lady you've had your eye on? Think she could step in for me?"
While I am definitely in agreement with all the people who have stated that there is great cause for alarm in how the legal players pulled this whole thing off, I also feel that the jury had enough information to fulfill what the definition of manslaughter means when broken down into layman terms. I mean, there are all kinds of loopholes in the interpretation of manslaughter. Actions of "reasonable person" and all that.
Also ...
Even pro-Grant people have to consider this:
Manslaughter, of which he was convicted, is a really vague legal definition. And could be construed as simply as this: Grant knew or SHOULD have known that Faylene's obsession with death was not healthy and as her husband, he knew or SHOULD have known that it should be taken seriously. His indifference, and possible fostering of these negative, self-destructive feelings and resulting environment could be construed as AIDING her in a manner that eventually led to her demise - negligence in handling what by all accounts is a serious situation, or possibly suicide. Even most religions mandate that the needs of your spouse are to be taken seriously. And her needs by no means were being met, even if she brought a lot of it on herself, he sure has hell didn't diffuse the situation.
On that note - aiding a suicide is manslaughter, and actions that result in a death that you KNEW or SHOULD HAVE KNOWN might be imminent is cause for manslaughter, and a person who speaks openly about dying prematurely and then left with pills, indifference and a louse of a husband - gee, spell it out for me.
I'm not so sure that he consciously set about causing or aiding in her death, but I do believe he was negligent in taking the situation seriously.
I also think he was high on his own perception of women wanting him and even the faux BFF-type relationship developing between the two women - as an obvious means of coping with wanting the same jerk -- all fed this guy's ego. I think he did a lot of charming and "be strong" placating to all parties to keep this gratification going, but I don't think he actually saw that someone would DIE. Nonetheless, that's IMMATURE thinking, cuz he SHOULD HAVE KNOWN that he fostered, if not set in motion, actions that could result in something as severe as death. And SHOULD HAVE KNOWN is legal enough for manslaughter. So yeah, he could be considered guilty without so-called "PROOF."
Austin,
Grant changed his story to the police over 10 different times. You speak the truth about him. Its a shame he didn't get 1st degree; because he planned the whole thing.Knowing his lifestyle; you can take pleasure; as I will; that his 4-5 years in prison will not be the best part of his life to say the least. Bubba will be his best friend in prison!Good luck with your future; try to move on the best you can and live a normal life. You'll always have your mom in your heart. Don't let these idiots get to you on this blog; 99% are clueless. We both know different. Sgt Ray knew Grant did it and did what he had to do. You may take pleasure when you read about the libel/slander suit being brought against McDonald and Grant's lackey Russell Cox. Stay tuned! And the worst is yet to come for Grant as he is about to be bankrupted with the civil suit just filed. The burden of proof is much lower; and the fact that one of the aggravators in the sentencing was the emotional and financial strain on the Eaves family is more than enough to ensure he will lose millions in the suit. What goes around comes around Austin and Grant's past actions caught up to him.
Paul Rubin will also be a defendant in the slander/libel case soon to be filed. We are giving him time to rectract the lies he has printed but that time is running out quickly.
Posted On: Wednesday, Jul. 1 2009 @ 11:56PM














