The Phoenix New Times News Blog



Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogroll

Arpaio's thugs threaten to arrest a New Times reporter for looking at public records

Wed Jun 11, 2008 at 09:30:16 PM

By Ray Stern

How close did I come to getting arrested by Maricopa County sheriff's deputies today? As Maxwell Smart would say, "Missed it by that much."

mcso%20guys.jpg
These cowardly MCSO deputies refused to identify themselves.

The problem: I had the nerve to want to look at the same public records that sheriff's deputies were scouring at the City of Phoenix public records counter.

First, a little background.

You'll recall that Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon has been putting a lot of political heat on Sheriff Joe Arpaio in recent months, ripping Arpaio for conducting "crime-supression sweeps" that are really intended to find illegal immigrants. At a luncheon in March to honor Cesar Chavez, Gordon said the Sheriff's Office was doing little more than locking up "brown people with broken tail lights." He reiterated the theme in a May 2008 Latino Perspectives Magazine article, writing that Arpaio has "created a 'Sanctuary County for Felons' with his reckless priorities–that target brown skin and cracked tail lights– instead of killers and drug dealers."

Pretty harsh words, and when the sheriff gets attacked, he bites back. In late April, the Sheriff's Office put in a public records request for every e-mail obtained or received from the mayor and a bunch of his staff members, including City Manager Frank Fairbanks. Arpaio also wants to see the mayor's meeting calendar and cell phone records. As New Times columnist Sarah Fenske wrote last month, the request appears to be a fishing expedition for any records that could harm the mayor politically.

It should go without saying that this request is another example of how Arpaio abuses the police powers of his office to try to intimidate and quiet his critics.

But it's also proving that Arpaio and his deputies are hypocrites, for two reasons:

Because the sheriff's public information officials often complain when the news media attempts the same kind of fishing expedition that his office is now conducting. And because the MCSO is taking advantage of a liberal public-records policy at the City of Phoenix that allows the public to scan in or photograph public records for free to avoid copying fees.

As I've written in a previous article, the Sheriff's Office won't let anyone to scan or photograph public records it releases, instead demanding a whopping 50 cents a page for copies. As my article notes, after I argued with the sheriff's publicly funded private lawyer about this issue in October, the Sheriff's Office cited me for disorderly conduct. I pleaded not guilty and am continuing to fight the charge.

Today, I got wind that sheriff's deputies were at the City of Phoenix building at 200 West Washington scanning public records into a machine they'd brought with them. When I arrived at the 15th-floor records counter about 3 p.m., two deputies were sitting near their scanner, waiting for the device to process a stack of papers. A large file box was next to the scanner, full of thousands of pages of documents.

msco%20scanner.jpg

I strolled up to the deputies, identified myself, and asked who they were. They refused to reveal their names, but that's them in the picture at the top of this article. I told the pair I was interested in seeing what documents the city had released to them, and asked them if it was all right if I took a peek at some of the documents in the box that they weren't using at the time. They said no way, then turned over some of the public records that had been face-up so I couldn't see them.

I stated that I had the right to simply reach into the box and look at the records, but the deputy in the blue shirt said he "wouldn't advise that." Which I took to mean, by the words and his tone, that he'd arrest me.

I called the mayor's office and told Scott Phelps, Gordon's spokesman, what was happening. And a few minutes later, City Attorney Gary Verburg showed up. In no uncertain terms, Verburg told the deputies I had the right to look at the public records.

Unfortunately, Verburg had to attend a City Council meeting and couldn't stick around. By then, brave blue-shirt had called for back-up.

In walked MCSO Captain Jim Miller and a couple of other deputies, including one of the sheriff's legion of highly paid flacks, Paul Chagolla. The deputies surrounded the scanner so I couldn't get near it to see what secrets they had obtained from the city.

Miller proved himself to be a real bully, practically begging me make a move that would allow him to arrest me. He accused me of wanting to take public records literally from his deputies' hands, warning me that such an action would certainly lead to arrest. He picked up a couple of random folders sitting on the records counter and waved them in my face. "Take these papers from my hand!" he snarled. "Take these papers from my hand!"

When I declined, he grinned smugly. "Wise man," he said.

capt%20james%20miller.jpg
Captain Jim Miller, (and the back of flack Paul Chagolla's head).

Then, Chagolla took his turn. He wagged a finger in my face, threatening repeatedly to arrest me for interfering with the sheriff's "investigation" if I tried to look at the documents getting scanned, or those in the box next to the scanner. Telling him the city attorney said it was my right legally to look in the box didn't phase him. Chagolla warned that he intended to report my actions to the City of Phoenix prosecutor who is helping the Sheriff's Office ream me on the bogus disorderly conduct charge.

A Phoenix security officer showed up, as well as two or three Phoenix police officers, including one commander. Hoping to prevent the showdown from getting truly ugly, the Phoenix records clerks said I could begin looking at the boxes of documents the deputies had scanned already, and I agreed to do that.

In about an hour, I quickly flipped through a few thousand pages of copies. It was a big pile of nothing. Typical e-mails about immigration issues. Citizens e-mailing city staff members newspaper articles, sometimes railing against or lending support to the mayor's views. Boring internal memos. I went through the stacks pretty fast. It seems the Sheriff's Office is getting zilch in this publicly funded vendetta against Gordon for speaking his mind (not that this would stop Arpaio from trumping up something against Gordon. He's done it before. His minions have done it to me).

While I was perusing the documents, a city "conflict resolution manager" walked up and laid down an Arizona law book. She pointed to the section of public records law that essentially says anyone can look at any public record during business hours. And then City Attorney Verburg came back and told me and the deputies again that I had the right to look at any public record. Upon hearing that, the deputies warned me again that if I tried to look at the documents in the box next to the scanner, I'd be arrested.

Of course, by then it didn't matter, since I'd seen most of the documents they'd scanned in previously, and those in the box (as well as two or three other boxes of papers the deputies had yet to scan in) were likely just more of the same. In any case, it appeared there was nothing worth getting arrested over today. New Times will look at the rest of the records soon enough.

"It's an unusual request," Verburg said later of Arpaio's public records search. "I don't think it will turn up anything."

Whether that prediction is accurate remains to be seen. But the city should've made the sheriff's request for records a much more difficult endeavor--by forcing Arpaio to play by his own rules. That is, forbid the deputies from using a scanner. Charge them 50 cents a page.

Heck, why not make the deputies review records in the city jail, using only a pencil and paper to take notes. (Arpaio has forced reporters he doesn't like, including me, to review records, using only a pencil and paper, inside one of his county gulags.)

That is, the city should fight back with the same intimidation tactics that Arpaio unleashes routinely on anybody who bucks him.

Category: News

86 Comments:

FrankG says:

Go get them Ray!

These officers are a discrace to the profession

Fastfeet says:

More of the same from the Sherriff and his goons. The investigation will turn up nothing and the tax payers will be the big losers. Just like the investigation against Terry Goddard. At least he didn't storm in with a search warrant and take the computers.. . .that is what he has done to others. The public be damned if there are no charges filed. Joe gets to peek at other peoples personal information in the name of good law enforcment. This man is frightening. He will stop at nothing to get to his enemies -- which wouldn't be so scary except for the fact that he has a badge and gun. His tactics are reminiscent of McCarthy and later Nixon -- or worse. He doesn't just pursue his enemies, he fabricates information, destroys records and lies. I fear that he has lost his mind and that Hendershot is running the joint. He's meaner than Joe and has nothing to lose. Joe must be stopped.

hdr says:

What is liberty and rights in this country coming to??

Coz says:

What does it take for those in power to see that these assholes need to go to jail ?

More murders, more deaths, more violation of civil and constitutional violations ?

Enough is enough....

Coz says:

Hitler would be very prond of MCSO...

Maybe they should re-name MCSO to the SS Goons of Maricopa County...

lula says:

You are brave man to endure this and not back down.
Thank you for being an example of a true american who refuses to let oppression take over.
God bless you and keep on fighting.

e says:

while i encourage sticking up for your rights and against a-hole authority figures like these guys...i also think that while you have the right to view public records you probably don't have the right to know what records someone else is looking at. if someone followed you in and said, 'hey whatccha lookin' at?', depending on what you were researching...you might not think they have the right to know what you're doing...that would be your right.

Jay says:

It's just as well you live in the States where you can say whatever you like without having to back it up with proof. Here (Australia) you'd have been tried, convicted, fined and jailed for slander. And there's plenty in this article that would qualify even if the basics are true because you rant, exagerate and employ perjoratives with wild abandon. If you want to be taken seriously, write soberly and leave out all the pretentious pseudo-intellectual padding.

John says:

"Citizens e-mailing city staff members newspaper articles, sometimes railing against or lending support to the mayor's views."

Seems the citizens who were in support of the mayors views could see some harassment.

Dennis Gilman says:

Nice job Ray Stern.
I don't usually support being arrested, but I can't help but think if I were there, I might of went for it. They needed to have their blufff called. And the discription is correct- They are Thugs, Nazi-Thugs. Its almost become a situation where they dont even bother with real criminals anymore. They are just intent on Ethnic Cleansing.

DominusOminous says:

As much as this is a local issue, the really disturbing part of it is the trend it points to... that being wide-spread point of view that the cops are no longer public servants, but rather overlords never to be disputed or questioned.

Rick Cain says:

The public is to blame for police excesses. We have always given them the benefit of the doubt, allowed them to exceed their legal mandate without repercussions, and remained silent when they abused the authority of their badges. Put a dirty cop in jail? You know how hard that is, even when guilt is obvious and evidence is not lacking.

Don't blame them, look in a mirror.

James says:

I'm glad that I don't live in Phoenix or Maricopa County.

James says:

I wonder if McGrampa supports these county police in their actions?

captbob says:

Sounds like you might have a case for filing simple assault charges against the deputies. If they were ordered to physically prevent you from viewing the records, you could charge the sheriff with criminal conspiracy.

Could be fun.


Fred says:

Nice to see taxes put to such good use.

Andy says:

It's so nice to see a newsman who'll do his job. It's such a pleasant change from the norm. Keep the pressure on this closet fascist!

Cheef says:

You're a brave man. These fascist pigs have no place in the United States of America.

Klopdx says:

If I were you I'd document this as much as possible and present it to the FBI for possible federal civil rights violations. That will get the sheriff's attention, bring the feds in to investigate him.

sunshyncat says:

I, too, am angered by the actions of Arpaio and the MCSO to the point of likening them to Hitler… but then I remember the nine million people murdered and the horrors of the holocaust. I remember the ghettos and the extermination camps, the experimentations, and the use of the body parts to make lampshades and soap. It turns my stomach to compare the relatively small amount of “power” Arpaio has with Hitler’s power to commit such atrocities. It probably also gives Arpaio’s supporters (and the Joke himself) a hard-on to see their “leader” associated with such power by people who are attempting to rally against them.

Rob says:

This story seems fishy to me, mostly because it is full of nothing but making the sheriff and the deputies look bad (not saying that they aren't, I haven't really heard of any of these people before.)
To me, it sounds like this.
Deputies were scanning documents, this reporter who doesn't like the Sherif's politics decides to poke at these deputies. Deputies tell reporter to back off and let them finish their job, reporter complains, calls city attorney. City attorney (who also dislike sheriff's politics tells reporter that he can look at any public record, even the ones that the deputies are currently holding. Reporter eventually see documents deputies have already scanned and is bored at what he sees, then writes this article telling everyone about how evil the sheriff and his deputies are.

Question; Does the reporter have the right to see what documents the deputies are copying?

This whole thing sounds like stupid politics to me. Sheriff was elected, if the voting citizens of the county don't like him they can always vote him out, or do a recall election.

Larry says:

Wow, and I thought Jefferson Parish, LA had the only Nazis’ in this country.

Some Guy says:

Remember this phrase: "Conspiracy to deprive of a constitutional right under color of authority". It's a charge that can be brought against any official behaving as you described above, and had Arpaio's thugs gone so far as arresting you, they could have been looking at a ten-year stretch in Leavenworth themselves.

Keep up the good work, and by all means, ALWAYS take several witnesses with you (and have a video camera running) when you're in these situations.

eh says:

Jay,

http://www.askoxford.com/asktheexperts/faq/aboutspelling/perjorative

This may be of some assistance to you. If YOU want to be taken seriously, that is.

Voice of Reason says:

If only this information came from a source that was credible and could be taken seriously, as opposed to one that is known for printing fiction as news. Unless, of course, you've all conveniently forgotten about the roving gourmet dinners of endangered species and household pets.

GWPDA says:

I still do not understand how the County cops can assert any right of arrest on City government property.

sunshyncat says:

Voice of Reason - If any "news" was completely credible this world would be an ideal place. Everyone would walk hand in hand licking ice cream cones and singing This Land is Your Land.

doesnt matter says:

Hey Jay. "Fuck You". How's that for a "perjorative"?

Joe Arpaio and anyone who works for him or supports him in any way is a fascist scumbag. He is a symbol of the worst of the worst of the worst of the lawless, authoritarian, make-it-up-as-you-go, do-whatever-they-want, better-than-the-public, above the law assholes that are ruining our country.

Joe Arpaio, I've been watching your antics for YEARS now, and YOU are whats wrong with this nation, you fucking piece of shit.

Joe Arpaio, FUCK YOU. Your day is coming.

eric says:

Isn't sheriff officers scanning public records that have absolutely nothing to do with enforcing the law misappropriation of resources?

I've recently read about a court case where a local government office tried to deny records in formats other than printed which it could charge for. The judge compelled the office to stop this practice.

Somebody with an interest should take it to court.

bennett says:

Instead of paying .19 cents a copy, he sent two deputies to copy the stuff. Shows you how little he thinks his manpower is worth. Couldn't these guys have been out chasing immigrants through the streets or somthing?

Enlightenment says:

The reporter should have asked the FBI or some one from the Federal Government to come along with him. The feds can take care of crooked cops and ruin their day!

thepocket says:

Hey all you commentors, remember the sheriff is an elected official. If you don't like his style VOTE for someone else.

Skeptic says:

Deputies were scanning documents, this reporter who doesn't like the Sherif's politics decides to poke at these deputies.

It's like the little dog who yaps at you from behind the chain link fence as you walk down the sidewalk. If you stop and look at him, he backs up six feet but continues to bark. If there were no fence he would be up on the porch, because he doesn't have enough courage to attack. The reporter plays the part of the little dog in this scene. He doesn't have the courage, in front of sympathetic witnesses, to take a piece of paper out of a box. Afterward, when there are no law enforcement officers present, he barks up a storm and it's published here. Wow, now that's bravery.

LJM says:

Skeptic,

You're confusing bravery for stupidity. It's a common mistake made by people who think thugs in uniforms are cool.

david saint says:

great article yet again!! Its astonishing how much MCSO thinks they are above the law. What will it take for the FBI or Justice Dept to take a serious look at whats going on? How many civil rights have to be violated before something is done? Personally, i wish they had TRIED (i emphasize try, cause it went so well for them with the owners didnt it) to arrest you. Im sure a judge would have gotten a good laugh at that one, mostly because its a clear cut case of a violation of the First Amendment, but we all know they think that doesnt apply to them. Im further astonished however at what their gathering, being emails from citizens. Whats to stop them from pulling a Robert Mugabe (dictator of zimbabwe) and targeting those that have sent emails with a less than favorable opinion of MCSO? I have to admit i knew thats what they were going after, so i didnt write the Mayor to give him his kudos for doing his job. So far no one with authority has stopped nor even said anything about this type of retrobution in the past, what would make me think it wouldnt continue? It must stop though, otherwise it takes away from the integrity of law enforcement and the feeling of security they are supposed to provide the community. The days of knowing that you can count on cops are becoming a thing of the past, and now its beginning to amount to county sponsored terrorism. If Thomas wont step in and do his job, its high time someone else did. A judge in Cave Creek has already laid the foundation for a stance against these Gestapo tactics and civil rights vilations, its time it went a step further.

Anymous says:

The words malfeasance and misfeasance come to mind when I read about the actions of these deputies.

An organization comes to mind when I think about the boorish behavior of the MCSO deputies--AZPOST!

If it were me, I would file a complaint with AZPOST about the behavior/actions of these deputies.

I am voting for Dan Saban in November.

John Galt says:


With love in our hearts...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64AkYIyf674

kenneth says:

earlier today i heard the often used term "the war on terror". how they hate us, hate our freedoms and so forth. then you read an article like this. if this is in fact what the terrorists want, all they have to is sit back, and watch those freedoms erode daily. if they are not careful though, they might end up with more freedoms than we enjoy very soon. then we can envy their freedoms, and we can send joe arpaio, and his thugs to terrorize them. but if the two thugs referenced above are representative of his goons, they wouldn't have a chance.

Coz says:

Capt. Jim Miller, now there's a Honduras going piece of shit.

jacobprimo says:

Keep up the good work. Sounds like it's time to bring the feds in and show these boys how to play by the rules.

PRIVATE CITIZEN says:

Mr.Stern. Perhaps you should not stray so far from your own newspaper for a story on political corruption.Isn't it the New York Times which blocked ALL coverage in its local own deep south newspaper---The Thibodaux Daily Comet---about an incredibly illegal wiretapping scandal which was conducted by Sheriff Craig Webre of Louisiana? Wasn't that a scandal which made George Bush's NSA illegal wiretapping look like pure patriotism. Webre electronically wiretapped massive numbers of federal,state and banking records of his political opponents and their contributors and even people who filed federal suits against him? And he did it so that he could get re-elected and continue his 16 years of iron-fisted, money-making rule on the bayous! What is it, you guys don't cover obscene violations of the United states Constiotution when a New York Times affiliate is implicated? Didn't the Daily Comet allow Webre's people to use its on-line news forums as the base to issue physical and economic threats against citizens who were daring to open their mouths about his corruption? A suit was even filed in federal court, wasn't it, but the New York Times-Comet has blocked coverage of the story and many more about Webre's malfeasance. From what happened down here in Lafourche Parish Louisiana and is still happening it seems that Webre's attacks on his own American citizens is just as grievous and newsworthy if not moreso as what happened to you. But then again we should add that Webre also is the President of The National Sheriff's Association. That's a lot of clout to throw at your New York Times lawyers when your local paper is implicated in helping Webre cover up his neverending scandals whileit rakes in money as the official parish newspaper.

david saint says:

skeptic:

funny how they act all tough behind a badge and gun. Arpaio and his punk thugs, and people like you i might add, are like that fkn nat at a bbq that just wont go away.

heres what the article should have been called : "In this weeks episode of AZ Confidential, cowardly MCSO punk thugs intimidate a reporter and threaten to arrest him for doing his civic duty and violate countless civil rights yet again"...yeah, i said civic duty. As it was once said by Michael J Fox in a movie, "it is our jobs as citizens to question our elected leaders, to ensure that they are doing their jobs not for their benefit, but for the benefit of those that elect them."(or something along those lines)..lets not forget that MCSO is well known for hiding public documents that could very well incriminate them. IE: Jail commissary books, MCSO books, Arpaio's property investments, and the most well known is when they destroyed documents in the Norburg case. Funny how they use the public records law for this highly questionable witch hunt, and further waste of county resources, yet think this same law doesnt apply to them isnt it?
take that and choke on it.

Mr. Stern,

Good work. Arpaio seems to get worse as time goes by. I'm glad his harassment isn't slowing you down.

AzCitizen says:

Arpaio needs to go. It doesn't matter where, as long as it's not here. Send him to Honduras, china or where ever. The MCSO goon squad also need to be taught a lesson by the FEDS. Bring in the Fed agents and lets see who can intimidate who. Out with garpile.

William Robles says:

WOW! I Guess Old Age is kicking in on Joke OOps I ment Joe. First it was us here in Guadalupe and now it's Ray's turn. Whats the hell is wrong with the so called bad ass joe? Good Luck Ray.

Valentyna says:

I'd love a public records request on MCSO detailing the cost of using 7 deputies and scanning equipment used for the purpose of avoiding charges of approxiamately $1900 by the City of Phoenix.

Tidy says:

From azcentral/ channel 12

http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blog/CaseyNewton/25548

http://www.azcentral.com/12news/news/articles/2008/06/12/20080612mcsopublicrecords06122008-CR.html

"City spokesperson Scott Phelps said MCSO Deputies had no right to block anyone from viewing or taking pictures of the documents, "They has eight sworn officers guarding cardboard boxes you own. People should be outraged at that," said Phelps."

Anon says:

Your yamsacks were hanging in the brambles.

The Sherrif's are obviously suffering from significant shrinkage.

Me says:

You know it used to only be the "lower classes" who really hated the police. Now the jack boots in blue have made enemies pretty much across the board. The consequences of the police acting like an enemy occupying army is that people tend to treat them and think of them as such. I for one know that if I saw a cop gunned down I would likely *PAUSE* before recalling any details that might help them catch whoever did it. Point of fact I now smile inwardly whenever I hear about one of those monsters finally getting his due. "Who shot the cop? Well... I think the guy was tall... no short... no well maybe average... Oh he was Latin American... No wait... Asian... yes... Asian... well maybe half Asian... he could have been white..."

I just found your story through the Lew Rockwell Blog (http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog).

Thanks for standing up to these bullies with badges.

Tidy says:

I'm surprised these 8 fools weren't assigned to protecting the Joke from the media, as today was Arpaio's last day to be deposed in the Lovejoy case..... So Joke... Which lie did you go with?

CooperG says:

No peace officer can refuse to identify themselves to a member of the public who asks for their name or serial number. File a complaint against everyone of them with AZPOST. Let THAT go in THEIR record.

Dan Saban for Sheriff!

Anatomy of a Police State says:

It starts with the seemingly 'small stuff", but Ray you exposed the tip of the iceberg!

The 50 cents per page we have to pay for courthouse records is to discourage the average person from copying files. The public should be charged less than the Sheriff's department -- we, the taxpayers have to foot the bill for THEM! The audicity.

Ray, thanks for standing tall, and allowing the public to see how the Sheriff's department operates. Just more proof of abuse of power. It shows the public that if they're going to into the public area offices, they need to have a witness with them, a video cam. This is chilling stuff!

This is exactly why we didn't write in our support for Mayor Gordon and the courageous stand he took to speak the truth.

Coz says:

I wouldn't piss on any of these MCSO pricks if they were on fire.

I would however take great pleasure watching them burn.

Boyd Durkin says:

I'm confused because all cops are heroes (country music, award shows, and politicians tell me so).

Segodnya says:

Judging by the pictures, the MCSO deputies could stand to lose some weight. Nice spare tires, guys.

On a more serious note, I quote Thomas Jefferson here: " . . . when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, IT IS THEIR DUTY [emphasis supplied] to throw off such government . . . . "

I'm not saying we should revolt because a couple of moron cops think they're above the law. I'm saying their behavior is illustrative of the way the government on all levels deals with the citizenry. This thing has been under construction for 70 years folks . . . maybe big government is finally being recognized for what it has been all along: nascent Stalinism.

Tax Slave says:

MCSO sadly isn't unique. There are rogues everywhere. Sheriff Vogel in Volusia County FL famously takes money from travelers on I-95, accuses them on being drug trafficers and then makes them prove they aren't just to get back their lawful cash.

It is the people who are to blame. We are a people who elected, then re-elected Bush, Clinton etc. Face it, we are a dumbed down nation of serfs who haven't a clue as to what freedom is about. We get what we deserve.

Those who exchange liberty for security get and deserve neither. That is us. We deserve these Nazi thugs.

And all these comments about bringing in the Feds to solve things is [b]lunacy[/b]. The problem is the worship of force and compulsion. All the Feds will do is subjugate a local jurisdiction to Leviathan. The solution is simple.... vote the bum out. Then, if he committed any crimes, try him in court and use due process of law. If that can't be done, it is the sheeple who are to blame. This guy is just another two bit thug. History is full of them. He is just a bit player in the scheme of things. The same as Herod, Pilate etc. In a generation or so, his name will be cursed.

david saint says:

Hey Gilman, what ya up to monday?? how bout we go down there bright and early, beat the flacks to the scanner, and use it all day scanning pointless documents too? hey, first come first serve right?? LOL...id love to see them arrest someone for that!!

Archie1954 says:

These police tactics are today's America. Think about the indigenous peoples harrassed and arrested in Columbus Ohio even though they had approval to walk through the city on their cross country tour. Think about those relatives and friends of high school graduates in Columbus S.C. who were arrested and put in handcuffs for applauding when their particular student received his diploma. You are living in a fantasy world if you don't realize that this kind of egregious police behaviour isn't the norm today.

Emil Pulsifer says:

I know that these columns are posted daily and that New Times is published weekly, but many of them are interesting and some of them are important, and I'd like to see NT publicize them better.

For the longest time I was completely unaware of the existence of this (Valley Fever) online column. I'm not sure why this is, though the title suggests (in my mind) some sort of trivial touting of local events a la Night & Day, and I tended to overlook it for that reason and under the false assumption that it was merely the online version of an obscure column from the print edition of NT.

Regarding MCSO's onerous and clearly punative public records requests to the City of Phoenix and others, the city may not be able to *legally* distinguish between bad faith and legitimate records requests, but I'm certain that there are a number of areas where COP is cutting MCSO some slack as a professional courtesy. Perhaps COP (and other jurisdictions) should consider playing hardball with the MCSO.

Arpaio has a stubborn streak a mile wide and, like other tinpot dictators, can't stand independent opposition. This can be used against him. The more he's frustrated, the more he'll cut-up rough, making an unholy ass of himself in the media and becoming his own public relations nightmare in the process.

If he wants to play Arpaio vs. The World then the latter should give him a taste of this: constant bureaucratic red tape, delays, and hardnosed strictly-by-the-book attitudes at all times and on all issues.

Not only that, but on every enforcement issue where the MCSO and its personnel is involved, but other administrative bodies have enforcement jurisdiction, they should step in and throw their weight around. Send food safety inspectors on surprise visits to MCSO kitchens. Make sure his deputies are obeying the traffic laws -- especially those with a reputation for hard drinking. Write the bastards up for everything. Be prepared to arrest uncooperative deputies on obstruction charges whenever feasible. Use cut-outs to discretely contact friendly representatives of the news media to publicize. Wash, rinse, repeat.

If he wants to be vindictive and engage in petty grandstanding, obstructionism, and sabotage, he should be reminded, in concrete ways, that politics is a two-way street.

If the administrators of the major police departments, major municipalities, and state political and law-enforcement bodies all give MCSO the cold shoulder, it should hasten the departure of Arpaio, Hendershott, and others in his hardcore cadre. Establish a strong (if undocumented) sense of solidarity with sympathetic administrators in neighboring/overlapping jurisdictions.

There are plenty of seldom enforced regulations and ordinances which provide perfectly legal ways to send a message to political rogue-elephants like Arpaio. His enemies in government should be researching ways to use them. After all, the County's top law-enforcement officer can scarcely complain (with any coherence, anyway) that his personnel are being prosecuted and ostracized for violations of the laws and regulations.

Needle the bully boys and fraudsters at MCSO until he froths at the mouth and starts baying at the moon, then point the media in his direction and enjoy the show. Remember Saddam Hussein?

Emil Pulsifer says:

(N.B. That should have read "punitive" in my previous comment.)

Regarding Archie1954's remarks, he has a point.

Still, it occurs to me that in many ways the MCSO under Arpaio is really more of a throwback to the way law enforcement used to be run. He's not so much a politician as an autocrat, and his sense of public relations is crude and deficient. Temperamentally and administratively he's a lot closer to a small town sheriff than to the the head of one of the largest county law-enforcement bodies in the nation. It's just that he has no competition and has been getting a free ride for a long time.

Now he's gotten just a little too big for his britches. His enemies in government should stop acting like tuna and start acting like sharks, circling and sniffing for blood.

They also need to start working the media better. If they're afraid of public opinion they just don't appreciate how malleable that is. If the so-called opinion makers see a number of authority figures taking an anti-Arpaio line often enough, they'll change their tune. In turn, the public, assuming there's no smoke without fire, will quickly fall into line.

It wasn't as if Joe Q. Public woke up one morning with an obscure Iraqi dictator named Saddam Hussein on his mind, demanding vengeance. Joe Q. Public is concerned with meeting his rent, keeping his job, the price of gas, his neighbor's noisy dog, office politics, and what's on television that night -- in short, with the things which form his everyday personal life. Nobody woke up and, out of the blue, said to his wife over the coffee, "Hey, what's with that guy in Iraq? Is he a danger to America, or what? Let's invade the country!" They were conditioned by months of media coverage.

Who prodded the media? Who kept these issues on the boiler? Figures in government. Because if it's an issue for movers and shakers, then the media figures it's important.

The fact that Hussein was a crude, egotistical, bad-tempered big-mouth who continually undercut his own case, merely made his enemies' job all that much easier. Anyone who has seen the raw media footage of Arpaio interviews with Channel 12 should see definite similarities. Imagine how he'll act when you try to take away his lollipop.

So get on the ball. Letters to the Editor. Op-Ed pieces. Behind the scenes action. Mayors, police chiefs, legislators, and those who owe them favors. Arpaio has made PLENTY of enemies over time, and I'm NOT talking about the criminals in his jails. There are plenty of individuals out there who KNOW THINGS, and plenty of individuals who were pushed out of the way or stepped on, and you can bet that the MCSO under decades of Arpaio rule has lots of dirty laundry to hide. Dig it out and make the public sniff it until they get sick of it and give him the boot.

His competitors, in their public rhetoric, should act on the dictum "know your audience". Out-Arpaio Arpaio: give 'em the law and order and tough on crime routine that he does, only with a twist -- you're clean and he's not. You're for serious law enforcement and he's a clown sucking the teats of the media. You respect the taxpayer and he thinks he can get away with juggling the books, vacations to Honduras, and ignoring the public records laws.

Don't say it once and forget about it, because the public won't remember what you say once when Arpaio has said something else 1,000 times, especially when they start out liking him and being indifferent to you. Say it until you're blue in the face. Keep elaborating and developing the theme to keep it fresh. Make your case with clear, simple examples and statistics. The public loves simple, dramatic numbers. Don't try to mislead them: you don't have to. Above all be persistent. The problem is a nail and the solution is a hammer.

Network. Gain allies. Exploit old grievances. If Arpaio during his long career was foolish enough to make wealthy enemies (or enemies who are now wealthy), solicit them for campaign funding and other assistance. Promise (or suggest the possibility of) jobs to sympathetic law-enforcement professionals. MCSO is a big fat career pie and right now Arpaio holds the pie-cutter. Anybody out there hungry?

atherfagalagi says:

if i'm not mistaken sheriff arpaio is an elected official. the people of arizona must like what he's doing since he's been sheriff for a very long time. too bad for the city of pheonix that it can't trump the state's jurisdiction.

anonymous says:

sounds as if Mr.Arpaio has more going on than what he wants to be known. Your efforts to stand up against the men in blue are well appreciated! Do not stand down in the way of true journalism!

Wilbur says:

I'd like to know the specific felonies that are being ignored by the MCSO in favor of rounding up illegal aliens, as reported in the article. I'm sure that if a fact or two was presented with respect to that, there might be more interest shown.

What's that? He would have included those details if he had them?

Mr. Ed says:

Wilburrrrrrrrrrr... They're felony warrants, numbnuts! You know, like warrants for murder, rape, armed robbery, selling meth to grade-school children! Guess these felonies aren't as important to enforce, to you and the other idiot crackers you hang out with, as beathing U.S. air while Mexican. Here's hoping you don't get jacked on the way back to your double-wide in Apache Junction. Man, your name says it all.

Coz says:

I can expect that MCSO will see a lot more of this now since people are finally waking up to their BS.

Emil Pulsifer says:

Arpaio is a COUNTY Sheriff, not a state official.

As for his popularity and the fact that he's been re-elected in 1996, 2000, and 2004, a meaningful analysis would include details about past electoral races. Can anyone provide a link to a page showing past candidates and their election funding information for these years, as well as background on the candidates and issues involved? Because I can't seem to locate this using Google.

Generally speaking, incumbents have a definite advantage, in terms of funding and public visibility. For 2008, according to a recent Arizona Republic article, Arpaio has 10 times more campaign funds than his opponent, Saban (about $350,000 compared to $35,000).

That means 10 times the advertising budget. Advertising is used to get your message to the voters. If you hear one message 10 times as often as another, which one are you likely to remember, assuming that you don't have an intense personal interest that prompts you undertake all kinds of independent research?

Meanwhile, Arpaio gets his mug on TV every other week, free of charge, as a result of being Sheriff. How many people today even know what Dan Saban looks like, much less what he stands for?

The whole "stepmother rape" accusation/smear certainly didn't help Saban in 2004, either. That leaves two previous re-election successes for Arpaio, and I'm not sure how much competition he had for either, though he apparently abused his authority by harassing some opponents: following them, bugging their houses and telephone conversations, etc. -- if Jim Cozzolino's accusations are to be believed; and given Arpaio's general patterns of behavior these accusations are at least credible on their face.

What has to be admitted is that Arpaio has consistently had high approval ratings in public opinion polls, even though these have slipped 20 points or so in recent months (but even so are still very strong).

Since the vast majority of the public knows nothing about the day to day operations of the MCSO, it has to be assumed that Arpaio's popularity is the result of propaganda successes.

Specifically, he has made a name for himself as someone who doesn't coddle "criminals" and who has pinched pennies on behalf of taxpayers rather than allow them to have "luxuries" such as coffee.

Arizona is a conservative state and the whole idea of giving jail inmates crappy food and depriving them of porn while saving TAXPAYER money serving green baloney (not to mention putting all of those tough-guys and predators in their place with pink-underwear) appeals to conservative, populist sentiment.

Fine, but the fact that persons merely accused and awaiting trial are not criminals; that Arpaio has cost these same taxpayers far more (through irresponsible administration leading to lawsuits, expensive insurance and other boondoggles) than he has saved through green baloney; that the tough-guy inmate predators rather than MCSO guards really run the jails behind the scenes; and that his guards and other employees have engaged in some truly horrendous human rights violations which were not remotely morally (never mind legally) justified -- these facts have never properly entered what might be termed the public consciousness.

To some extent, this must be regarded as a propaganda failure on the part of his opponents.

My view is that populists, while socially conservative, can be stronly appealed to on the basis of genuine justice. Crappy food for jail inmates won't bother them, but fascistic abuses of power will -- provided they can be made to believe that this has occurred.

Individuals whose primary concern is saving money from their own wallets won't care about restoring three meals a day for criminals but will care a great deal about administrative practices that end up not merely eating up the money they have saved through green baloney, but actually costing them more than a normal "liberal" jail would -- provided they can be made to believe that this has occurred.

Individuals who want society to control inmate behavior instead of the other way around cannot be appealed to by means of arguments about the First Amendment rights of prisoners; but they WILL care about jails which, underneath a superficial "law and order" veneer, are actually run by violent, drug-dealing criminal gangs of inmates -- provided they can be made to believe that this is what goes on in Arpaio's jails.

Of course, it takes money to get your message out to the public on a consistent basis, and being outspent by your opponent ten times means having your message swamped by his.

Furthermore, if the mainstream media supports the incumbent -- or at least doesn't actively oppose him -- then you're going to have even more difficulty getting your message out: because part of a "message" is its meaning, and while ads present the message, the "meaning" of this message is interpreted by editorial writers and talking heads on television and radio, who influence vast audiences that don't have the time or inclination to do personal research.

New Times has (for whatever reasons) done an excellent job of providing honest to goodness, detailed, old-fashioned muck-raking journalism about the MCSO under Sheriff Arpaio. Not just a few paragraphs of neutral (or neutered) information, but actual investigative journalism, running to half a dozen full pages per story and not afraid to offend the Big Wheels.

Unfortunately, a lot of potential Sheriff's race voters (and especially those whose demographic counts where campaign finance and social influence is concerned) wouldn't use New Times to wipe their asses. All they have to do to get turned off is see all of those stupid death-metal and pothead and phone-sex ads -- not to mention the other gratuitous, so-called counterculture coverage which New Times runs. For them, if it isn't in The Arizona Republic and on the local nightly news it "just isn't true".

Fortunately there has been a little catch-up lately in which the mainstream news organs have begun to get a whiff of the taint of corruption emanating from the MCSO. Still, they're hamstrung. They're hamstrung by conservative editors; by the need to maintain access to the people and institutions they are expected to cover; by an essentially reactionary philosophy of journalism in which the "momentum" of past events and trends governs the current behavior of the news organ; by popular opinion (whether real or merely perceived); and by advertisers whose audiences are far more conservative than those of New Times. They would have been hamstrung in the days when newspapers ruled the media roost; and they're even more hamstrung today, when circulation is dwindling and the opinions of a small but influential demographic of readers count as much or more than in years past.

Still, I'm convinced that a persistent, well-planned and orchestrated propaganda campaign by Arpaio's opponents, targeting his supporters using their own values, and taking the cause to the mainstream media whenever possible, while making use of alternative media sources like New Times, could do a lot more for the cause of truth and justice, not to mention their own professional careers.

How many interviews has Saban given lately, to either the Republic or to New Times? How many letters to to editor, op-ed pieces, and other media blitzes has Saban attempted? Perhaps he is waiting for the November campaign itself to use his scarce funds. Understandable, but in the meantime he needs to maintain media visibility and get his message out to as many sympathetic news organs as possible.

As for all of those Sun City voters, I can only hope he understands the need to appeal to them directly using their own values.

The only form of campaign which has any chance of capturing the imaginations and loyalty of voters, in a campaign in which one is financially outspent and one's opponent has not made the kind of immediate, personal errors which the mainstream media regards as unforgivable, is a grassroots effort. Saban needs to get out to Sun City months before the election, repeatedly, speaking to audiences and answering their questions. He needs to be prepared to appeal to their own values and to defeat Arpaio using his own arguments. He'd better have some good explanations to use against the charges/smears raised against him the last time around.

Not only will this give him a lot of experience (and insight into what refinements are needed) well ahead of time, but he has a chance, simply by paying attention to these voters, to build two assets valued by advertisers and politicians: brand recognition and consumer good-will. These old folks are literate, opinionated, have plenty of time on their hands, and in many cases have developed important public influence via their lifelong career and personal contacts -- not to mention having disposable income. Be friends with them. Listen to their concerns. Be honest, and criticize Arpaio while respecting the office and the need for tough law-enforcement. It's flattering when public persons seek out your attention and opinions, and encouraging when they incorporate your values into their political platforms.

Manny Montilla says:

I don't know anything about this but after reading of Arpaio's suppression of truth and not allowing one to read public records that should be allowed by anyone to read, I hope you help to bring that bastard down and down hard.
I hate bullies, and I hate people who suppress truth. This guy is both and deserves to be brought to justice for it.
That is, good justice---the kind of justice that is righteous.

Good work standing up to bullies.

pogue says:

Sheriff Joe Arpaio is a modern day Huey Long!

Anonymous says:

Emil Pulsifer, your absolutely right...

We cannot depend on other elected Officals or the FBI to do the right thing and put a stop to all this, they are all to busy looking the other way, and have been for years.

It's time we as the public continue to expose what their all about until they are gone from office or put in jail where they belong...

Ray Stern is an uppity, annoying dweeb who should learn some manners.

My deputies stopped him from rummaging through the documents to be scanned because it would disrupt the process.

As stated, he was welcome to look at any documents which my deputies had already processed and returned.

If he hadn't yelled and screamed at my attorney, there would have been no disorderly conduct charges.

If Ray Stern learned some manners and self-control he would be much more effective.

Joker2 says:

Jana Bomersbach has a handwritten, signed note from Sheriff Joke's first election campaign in which he promised to serve one term only. That was conveniently forgotten by this publicity seeking, knuckle-dragging troglodyte as in his first week he spent 80k$ having stationery reprinted. The sales tax for jails built a country club for his legion of Barney Fife deputies. Tent city remains a Gitmo right here in the middle of town and a disgrace to a department run amok by an egomaniac and to the voters who keep putting the doofus back in the big chair. Tip" Next time vote for he other guy!

Jim Bob Modesto says:

The "process"! The "process" of what exactly?! All you (if that IS you, Joe, writing in; reads more like it's one of your pitiful deputies involved in this pathetic idoicy)are doing is carring ut a vendetta against another of your political enemies. This time, Phil Gordon. Everybody knows that. Ray Stern just got in the way of your latest wasting of taxpayer money. More and more people, even your base in Sun City, are getting fed up with this waste of yours -- especially in tough economic times. Next time, many of us hope and pray the Phoenix police "arrest" crybaby Jim Miller or any of the other littls scums you send out to do your dirty work. You know, he's one of the ones that's been vacationing in Honduras. Jimbo, you haven't heard the last of that. Meanwhile, you showed the world what a hotheaded "dweeb" you are. Ha, you looked like you were gonna stroke out in that picture. The whole county is laughing at you over that boo-hoo report of yours. As for the yelling "Joe Arpaio" mentions, you are the only one doing it. Joe, isn't this guy Miller a big liability to you. Just saying...

rose young-stewart says:

If no one there likes Joe's tactic's then i wonder why he keeps getting re-elected year after year?
You should be proud of him.

Emil Pulsifer says:

It appears that these deputies are the ones lacking common courtesy (and common sense). If they had simply replied to Stern's request with a calm "You can see the documents we're currently scanning just as soon as they are scanned", there would have been no problem.

Instead, as usual the MCSO deputies turned the encounter into a contest of power, in which they were rude, aggressive, provocative, and threatening. Stern, to his credit, instead of backing down (being careful, of course, to avoid being baited by Miller), calmly insisted on his rights. The deputies then escalated the matter into a major incident.

Now (apparently) Arpaio himself has decided to rush out and stomp out that flaming bag on his doorstep. Whoops.

Cletus says:

The solution is to the problem is simple. Prosecute these morons. Their conduct is actionable and should be dealt with in court. I may be mistaken but I believe Arizona still has misprision of felony statutes on the books.

Rob says:

Modern day SS is what ol'e Joe has turned the MCSO into. His constant trampling of not only the LAW but the Constitution is reprehensible to say the least.

When will the voters of Maricopa County finally realize that the rights of "ALL" citizens are being violated by his office. A violation of anyone's rights eventually leads to a violation of everyone's rights.

arizona native says:

Not everybody that works for MCSO is a "Goon" as you refer to them. There are alot of Deputies that are good cops and don't agree with what goes on in the office. We don't get to pick who are boss is.pub

Shawn says:

Interesting blog about Sheriff Arpaio; while I don t wish to turn this into a "Beat up on Sheriff Joe" day, Im noticing a disturbing pattern here as reported from concerned residents within the county, rather than from disgruntled former inmates.

If the good citizens of Maricopa County are so concerned with such an apparent demagog; perhaps they could petition the president to send in the marines to restore Peace, Order and Good Government and most importantly "Democracy"

While I'm not sure what sort of oil reserves the county may have; Im certain the President might consider deposing the Sheriff in the interests of a more "Americanized" standard of law enforcement and democratic system of governance.

All kidding aside; if he is truely this much of an autocrat who has simply lost his focus as the county's chief law enforecement officer with a very well defined mandate, perhaps the time has come for some changes to be made.

In the culture of an old boys club with this much power and influence to dispense their own form of justice as they see fit, in a draconian and arbitrary manner; we can pretty much agree that absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Perhaps Sheriff Roscoe P Coltrain would serve as a better replacement, with Boss Hogg as County Commissioner; it would seem that the politics of both Maricopa and Hazzard County share much in common.

If there needs to be a review of the Sheriff's conduct, I might suggest that a flood of calls, faxes, emails and letter mail with petitions be sent to the states Attorney Generals office. Flooding the local media (print & broadcast media) might be a good start as well.

I question the need to go on an evidentiary fishing trip at the records office in order to compile a new list of "Usual Suspects" to round up.

I challenge the rationale of subjecting his inmates to the intollerable and inhumane living conditions of these internment camps that can prove to be a dangerous potential for heat stroke or heat exhaustion.

The pink underwear I suspect is intended as a tool to dehumanize inmates for some sort of twis