The Phoenix New Times News Blog

Update: Napolitano yanks Arpaio's immigration funding

Wed May 14, 2008 at 04:19:32 PM

By Ray Stern

As expected, Sheriff Joe Arpaio threw a tantrum when he found out Governor Janet Napolitano was cutting his allowance.

After first reading of the cuts to his immigration enforcement efforts in New Times, Arpaio held an impassioned, late-afternoon news conference on Tuesday to protest the governor's move with his political buddies, Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas, Arizona House Speaker Jim Weiers and Mesa state Representative Russell Pearce.

The story of two powerful Arizona politicans battling over the hot-button immigration issue has now made headlines from here to New York City. You can watch raw video of the news conference on KTVK Channel 3's Web site.

Typical of his bluster, Arpaio lashed out at the governor and her political allies, vowing he'd find funds to replace the $1.6 million getting taken away, and that nothing would keep him from targeting illegal immigrants his way.

"One thing you don't do is try to take away my money," Arpaio spewed. "I still have a gun and a badge."

vanderpool.jpg
DPS Director Roger Vanderpool

The fight is over a piece of the $10-million-per-year pie set aside by state lawmakers last year for immigration enforcement. The Arizona Department of Public Safety is the prime beneficiary of the funding, but the Sheriff's Office qualified for some, too, because it has a special agreement with the federal government. The agreement, known by its federal handle as a 287G, allows Arpaio to cross-train 160 of his deputies in immigration work with the U.S. Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

By last October, Arpaio's office obtained about $1.5 million of the state funds for his anti-illegal-immigrant programs, which had garnered national attention for their aggressiveness. As documented in numerous articles and in electronic media, Arpaio teamed up with Thomas to prosecute average illegal immigrants as smugglers, and deputies rounded up corn vendors and other run-of-the-mill illegals who happened to be driving dilapidated vehicles.

Arpaio then got Representative Pearce to help him squeeze more money out of the state; his allocation for the state's 2008 fiscal year was bumped up in October to $2.2 million. DPS Director Roger Vanderpool, at the time, sent a letter to Pearce noting that the DPS planned to have the whole $10 million spent by the end of fiscal year 2009, but had only been planning to give the MCSO $1.3 million a year. Vanderpool quips at the end of his letter that he hope his opposition to MCSO's request for more money isn't "held against DPS."

The switcheroo has infuriated Republican leaders like Pearce, who said at the press conference, "This is simply a political effort to destroy and to thwart what the sheriff is doing."

Which may be true. Nearly everything about this situation -- from the way Arpaio goes after illegal immigrants to Napolitano's latest move -- reeks of politics. Everyone seems to be lying, from Arpaio's disingenuously calling his roundups of Mexicans "crime suppression sweeps" to Napolitano's saying (during interviews this morning) the shift of funds "was a law enforcement decision, nothing more."

That comment contradicts a statement by her spokewoman, Jeanine L'Ecuyer, in the East Valley Tribune today that Arpaio's roundups spurred the MSCO cut.

Though Vanderpool's letter mentions one reason for shorting Arpaio is "limited funds," House Speaker Jim Weiers told reporters at last night's news conference that the DPS never told him the money was drying up.

"This is something out of the blue," Weiers said. He added that he'd like to find the money to fund both Arpaio's immigration efforts and the fugitive felon task force. One Legislature insider says that's going to be the solution to the flap between Napolitano and Arpaio: both will get their way, at double the taxpayer expense.

Arpaio said at the press conference that he was blindsided by the governor's unexpected cut. Last week, a vote by the Maricopa County Supervisors approved $1 million of the state funds to be transferred to the Sheriff's Office, though he would have also been able to obtain another $600,000. Arpaio said he had heard county Supervisor Mary Rose Wilcox, who cast the Supervisors' lone dissenting vote, "bragging" that the funding soon would be eliminated by the governor. But Arpaio told reporters he first read about what had happened in New Times.

The sheriff admitted that he was miffed at Napolitano. The two "had a little meeting" last week, but she hadn't warned him what was coming, he said. He wouldn't elaborate on what was discussed.

"I just want my money back," Arpaio said. "I want her to double it." (Note the emphasis on my).

Meantime, he said, he plans to soon take his ICE-trained deputies back to Mesa, whose police chief, George Gascon, is one of his biggest critics.

"Who says I don't have the money [without the lost state funds]," Arpaio said. "I know how to manage money. We'll get it done one way or another."

County Attorney Thomas says his office is examining whether Napolitano's diversion of funds is legal. It's a question worth asking, because the appropriations bill that pooled the money states, "The $10,000,000 is to be used for functions relating to immigration enforcement, including border security and border personnel."

But Napolitano's position seems safe on this one: Just as Arpaio's "crime-suppression" operations are catching plenty of illegal immigrants, a portion of the 48,000 fugitive felons in Maricopa County are illegal immigrants--which would make the new task force related to immigration enforcement.

Category: News

8 Comments:

FrankG says:

The Joker is like a spoiled kid who didn't get his way.....mine, mine, mine.....me....me....me

CooperG says:

If Arpaio is making the county safer by his pig-with-lipstick "crime sweeps," then how come the felony warrant count keeps increasing? If he's so good at it, then how come all of the other police departments like those he hates (Phoenix and Mesa) do more to find undocumented immigrants than Arpaio?

Concerned Taxpayer says:

Outstanding investigative work, Ray Stern, and New Times. This really grabbed some serious attention that opened up the Pandora's Box? To hear the raging Arpaio on TV last night and Thomas threatening on the radio today, it looks like you've hit on something. All people are to these elected officials is about MONEY, nothing to do with civil or human rights. They need their head count. The rest of the country better weigh in, their tax dollars are coming to a back water state run by goons. Watch the video clips scattered throughout the New Times archives and see for yourself how they conduct themselves. Then ask yourself if this is who you trust to handle your money and the Border crisis? Arizona has detached itself from the United States and resembles a Third World Junta!

Concerned citizen says:

Frank G -- Joe's temper tantrum is like a kid who had his marbles taken away -- you painted the perfect picture. Hope others see it for what it is.

Angry American says:

Kudos to the Gov.
She made a wise "political" move to divert the funds to the true law enforcers.

This isolationist lone wolf tactics from the Sheriff isn't doing a public a service. Its making matters worse by allowing the felons named Rick, Bill, Keith, James, and Jim to roam free comitting acts of evil, when Jose, Juan, Maria, and Mary are here in the country legally with proper documentation and works visas doing jobs that Americans won't do. Those "crime suppression" just isn't working for the Sheriff, its all a complete SHAM!!

May the true Law Prevail!

Loyal American says:

The Illegal alians coming over the boarders are plain and simple "OUTLAWS".
I am a citizen of these United States.If I break the law there are consequences for me, be it fines or jail.
It is NOT this countries responsibility to raise the standard of living of foreign countries or their citizens, especially at the cost of our citizenry's standard of living!
It is their country's goverment that must provide for their peoples wellfair. If not, the people must make a change to that goverment to suit the citizenry of that country.

david saint says:

wow, joe has completely lost it. I can just see him now, stompin his feet, flailing his arms, "its my party and ill cry if i want to"..anyone else see that hes gone senile? Funny how when joe bends the law to his favor, you dont see Thomas saying is this legal. Guess its only ok to bend and break the law if your a sheriff or County Attny.. I love the manuver though, using the same tactic..
While im sure its political, i find it amusing that only the state GOP is getting riled up, not Democrats...Which kind of surprises me considering hes blasting their presidential nominee in his book, and basically leveling a personal attack wagin war against him also...this is good, now you know hes lost it when he thinks he can intimidate the Mayor, the Gov, and now the state Senator/Presidential GOP Nominee...keep diggin that hole joe, your on your way out...

giudeigh says:

Loyal American says: "If I break the law there are consequences for me, be it fines or jail." Maybe soon that will be true, but with Sheriff Joke's vendetta against certain people, that sure hasn't been the case of late--you'd be just not good enuf for a soundbite from the Jokester. That's why Janet yanked some of his funding.

Post a comment

Comments may not show up immediately after submission. Please wait a minute after posting a comment for it to appear.




Phoenix New Times Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff