Joe Arpaio's Chad Willems Talks to the Shadow Army about the "Blocking Campaign" and the End of GOP Rule in Maricopa County

Willems pumps up the alter kockers with his doomsday scenario, talk of spies in the other camp, and a plan to "block" voters from signing the recall petition

As promised in this week's column, above is the audio of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's campaign guru Chad Willems speaking to the pro-Joe "shadow army" at state GOP headquarters in Phoenix on February 16.

See also:
-Why Sheriff Joe Actually Is Nervous About the Recall Effort Against Him

A concerned citizen turned the audio over to videographer Dennis Gilman and I, and Gilman created this YouTube offering using photos from that day, allowing you to experience this pathetic passel of angry old white men and women in all their decrepit glory.

Read the Shadow Army's orders from Arpaio's chief strategist Chad Willems.

Just be glad there's no smellovision as the reek of decaying flesh, soiled Depends and prune flatulence must have been overwhelming. God bless the patriotic American who helped Gilman and I with this secret mission into the heart of Republican darkness.

The audio is significant for demonstrating how scared Joe and Willems are of the recall by Respect Arizona, and for detailing Willems' plans for a "blocking campaign" to slow down the recall, using volunteers to disrupt the efforts of petition circulators who need 350,000 valid signatures from qualified electors by May 30 to force a special election.


My Voice Nation Help
86 comments
danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

HaHaHaHa, just checked Robert (JoeArpaioFan) cheesy-ass Arpaio page. one guy posted that he went and signed the recall petition and noticed there were no "shadow warriors" out there doing the simple job Willems assigned them. Robert (JoeArpaioFan) replied to him that they were there and filming and observing. Didn't Willems say to stand next to the petitioners and tell people NOT to sign? leave it to the birthers to screw up a simple thing. the whole point of Willems meeting was to get people to stop people from signing, not to let them just go ahead and sign. so that tells you even the birthers are tossing in the towel. oh yeah, i forgot....aside from Robert's little love notes to Joe on that site, it's mostly people posting what a joke Joe is and those are the posts that are getting all the likes....not Roberts posts.if you need a good laugh today, it's worth checking out

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

I love how Willems is upset and claiming the recall movement is funded from out of state, so what if it is? Joe's campaign fund that got him in came from out of state, so why not use the same peoples money to get him out? and then Willems goes on how it could cost us 5.5 million.....again, so what? that 5.5 million is a hell of a savings over what Joe has cost us and will cost us. he's already "LOST" over 100 million with no paper trail to even hint as to where it might have gone. and that isnt even counting the over 75 million in needless lawsuits and death payouts. what Willems ought to be more worried about right now is how much the birthers are going to cost us when they have to pay for the kiddie diddler Klayman's lawsuit that will fail because it has no merit  (because if you read up on Klayman....he doesnt pay anybody anything). and to top it all off, we will actually get someone in that office that will enforce ALL the laws, not just one law (and only to certain people)

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

Holy Crap!!!!!! Robert (JoeArpaioFan), i just thought of something, and maybe you can explain it for us. Joe claims he didnt write, read, research or know whats in HIS book, yet he collects the royalties from it. Now wouldnt that be misrepresenting himself as someone else...especially since he claims that its about him and are his words? when they questioned him about the book and its beliefs, he said he doesnt agree with it and those are not his views....but again..he is still collecting the royalty checks claiming that its his life story. so Joe is misrepresenting himself as someone else and making money while doing it, does that sound like any crimes he is vowing to go after? let me help you, it sounds like identity theft. both are assuming the identity of someone else and representing themselves as that person to mislead others. now as to whether or not it is actually breaking the law? i dont know, but it sure is resembling that crime especially since Joe is claiming it all to be factual stuff about him and his life (until he is in court.....then he has no idea who the guy in the book is, because Joe sure dont feel that way, right?)

deniseaz2003
deniseaz2003

why would even try to get an attorney from D.C. to try to stop a legal recall ? could it be that every lawyer West of the Mississippi river knows that such is a lost cause ? or maybe they tried to get that Montana lawyer to once again come in ,, but he after being burned once ,, is smart to stay out of the state of Az mess ups , even more the county buffoons ?? then in the end ,, wind up with this case of insanity all on it's own accord . good choice , great choice ,,,, for the actors of the tea party thuggs... class act folks ,,,, NOT !!!!

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

how do you cut a diamond? with a diamond, its the only thing hard enough.  how do you defend a guy who ignores child molestations? with a guy who cant keep his hands off the kiddies, he's the only one sick enough to take the case

deniseaz2003
deniseaz2003

ey Birfers, you might want to ask what your latest hero, Larry Klayman, is going to be doing on March 15.

The answer? He’s scheduled to appear for an arraignment in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, on two counts of criminal non-support. Seems he owes his two children more than $78,000 in back child support.

That’s right, birthers, more than $78,000. To take care of his two kids.

You guys really know how to pick ‘em.

So now we can call him Larry “Deadbeat Dad” Klayman.

this is  from this  link, http://turningthescale.net/?p=666


so as a good time Charlie dead beat daddy ,, i wounder if JoKKKe will haul him off to the tents when he shows his face again in this county ???  if not , then JoKKKe is only dead beat daddy round up , ,only when he wants ,,,,

oscaroscaroscar
oscaroscaroscar

Scared old white people, that is all they have.  They know that their day came and went, the dregs of the old guard are slowly draining out.  They are scared, they should be. Racist Russel got thrown out the door, time for Joe to go.  Shadow that, you silly old reactionary fools...

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

what the hell man? where was this "shadow army" when Joe got kidnapped? why couldnt they stop Joe's kidnappers? and where the hell was Seagal while all this was happening?

Steve Vega
Steve Vega

Another tic; what a waste of a lifelong.

MaskedMagician1967
MaskedMagician1967 topcommenter

@danzigsdaddy

Zigs, I think you just made a great fraud case.

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

since Joe doesnt agree with any of the stuff in that book (as he states in his testimony), WHY HAS HE NOT SUED HIS CO-AUTHOR FOR SLANDER? heres the answer Robert, Because Joe is lying. those are his words and his beliefs and if he tried to go after his co-author, the guy would provide proof that Joe is saying this stuff and then Joe would have to face perjury charges

WhoKnows
WhoKnows topcommenter

@deniseaz2003 I'll bet this DC atty isn't licensed in AZ and there have been no reports of him teaming up with an AZ lawyer.  But the only AZ lawyer that is stupid enough is Rachael Alexander, and she left for the North West!

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

@deniseaz2003  funny shit!!! where in the hell did they find this turd? good god he makes Arpaio and Seagal look good. he's just gonna rape the sun city birthers for their pension checks, he doesnt have a leg to stand on, but he sure as hell will bill them for it

MaskedMagician1967
MaskedMagician1967 topcommenter

@danzigsdaddy

The shadow army was raising a family and contributing to society. And Seagal was too busy having unprotected sex with one of his sex slaves.

Douglasap_
Douglasap_

@JoeArpaioFan I am willing to give anyone $100 who can prove to me that JoeArpaioFan is not the bastard, special needs lovechild of Larry Klayman and Janice Brewer

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

@JoeArpaioFan  HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! little Robert... I saw your little Joe Arpaio Facebook site.  and then i saw what everybody was posting on it (by the way if Dennis Gillman is reading this....well done sir, well done, you too Bob....funny stuff people, funny stuff). and then the funniest damn thing happened.....little Robert decided he couldnt handle being rebutted with facts and conflicting views, so little Robert started a different Joe Arpaio Facebook page that those people couldnt post the actual facts that discredit little Roberts claims on.  FUNNY STUFF PEOPLE. you all have Robert folding up his delusional little site and trying to start another like the petulant little child he is. I saw all the people from here that posted and was able to pick out who was who before little Robert had to delete posts by you guys.  (he deleted a few of Dennis Gillmans if you didnt see them, they were of Joe lying about what was in his book, and the other was the video that showed Marty Atencio NOT being combative, and now you know why Robert had to remove them....they proved him wrong)

WhoKnows
WhoKnows topcommenter

@JoeArpaioFan What happened to your little website?  It get taken away from you after you posted threats?

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

@MaskedMagician1967  it should be the one on here down a little bit. if that doesnt work, lt me know and i'll put it on here

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

@MaskedMagician1967  not me, I'm just bringing up a point that Dennis Gillman (damn fine individual) has brought up with his Joe Arpaio testimony video.   many thanks for pointing that out Dennis

MaskedMagician1967
MaskedMagician1967 topcommenter

@danzigsdaddy

It might be more than that. You mentioned royalty payments, which usually means copyrights are involved.

Copyrights are regulated by the federal government.

If the '09 testimony is to be believed, Joe is collecting money on a non-existent copyright. Making Joe subject to a potential claim of federal fraud.

MaskedMagician1967
MaskedMagician1967 topcommenter

@WhoKnows @deniseaz2003

So I wonder what happened to her "appeal" of her law license suspension and her $67,000 lawsuit against taxpayers for not providing her with an appellate attorney?

MaskedMagician1967
MaskedMagician1967 topcommenter

@danzigsdaddy @deniseaz2003

Anybody who can make both Seagal and the Flaccid Failure look good must have a laundry list of dirty deeds... we need more info on this sick old man...

MaskedMagician1967
MaskedMagician1967 topcommenter

@Flyer9753 @JoeArpaioFan

Flyer, I have to wonder if Robert is a registered sex offender....

MaskedMagician1967
MaskedMagician1967 topcommenter

@danzigsdaddy

Zigs, a thought:

》If Jaffy is sick enough to support the Flaccid Failure and Klayman, and has kiddie porn, he's probably a level 3 sex offender.

》If Jaffy supports people like Arpaio and Klayman, he very likely supports woman-beaters like twice-disgraced, corrupt, narcissistic and mentally sick Pearce and Scott Bundgaard.

》Jaffy also finds no shame in people like Adrian Cruz and Rocky Marquez escaping from custody.

Just a thought, of course.

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

oh look, little Robert changed his Facebook settings on his second site, now you can post.........although nobody is going to it though. but i noticed Dennis Gillman is helping out Robert by putting up some more Arpaio stories for him (although i dont think little Robert is quite enjoying the stories Dennis is helping him with) and i also see more people are piping in and calling Roberts bullshit for what it is.  well done people, well done. and since there is more against Arpaio than for Arpaio.......well that just tells us his popularity is even less than Robert claims

MaskedMagician1967
MaskedMagician1967 topcommenter

@danzigsdaddy

Lmao Jaffy here reminds me of suspended, disgraced, corrupt former Deputy Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Alexander.... I told you Jaffy's her unemployed fiance....

dennis20
dennis20 topcommenter

@WhoKnows @JoeArpaioFan  The last time I saw that sicko site Jaffy had child porn posted on it. That might be one reason they pulled it. 


MaskedMagician1967
MaskedMagician1967 topcommenter

@danzigsdaddy @MaskedMagician1967

Is it the one where Jaffy responded to WhoKnows or the one where Jaffy linked his Facebook page without responding to anyone?

Flyer9753
Flyer9753 topcommenter

@danzigsdaddy @Flyer9753  

that's why I replied to this comment, I was replying to your now deleted post when all of a sudden my window to write in disappeared :)

and yes, funny shit!

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

@Flyer9753   good I posted it, but made a mistake and went to edit and it lost the address (I was just going to re-post it)

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

@MaskedMagician1967  so far as i know he hasnt made any copyright infringement, but with all the bullshit that comes out of that colon on a neck.....who knows

MaskedMagician1967
MaskedMagician1967 topcommenter

@danzigsdaddy

It may be more than that. You mentioned royalty payments, which means copyrights are involved.

And copyrights are regulated by the federal government. 17 USC 506 lays out the penalties for copyright infringement.

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

@dennis20  really? well hell, I'll step up and pull an Arpaio and take credit for that observation then. I just thought about it when I saw the caption with the video mentioning fraud. unlike Arpaio, I figured give credit where credit was due. I dont know if I would have made the association or thought about the co-author having proof of Joe lying if it werent for the video.

dennis20
dennis20 topcommenter

@MaskedMagician1967 I may have posted the video but Zigs is making some points I hadn't thought of.  I was thinking more of consumer fruad for the foolish sheep who bought the book in the first place. 


danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

@MaskedMagician1967  evidently fraud is not a crime (at least it isnt if its Joe doing it)

MaskedMagician1967
MaskedMagician1967 topcommenter

@danzigsdaddy @MaskedMagician1967

My bad. Kudos to Dennis.

deniseaz2003
deniseaz2003

@MaskedMagician1967 i am not sure ,, but i am thinking she lost the appeal , and as the other it might have been tossed out the door before it even got to be ,,, but again i am not sure of the final out come of that .

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

@deniseaz2003   page after page after page after page..........forget asking why Arpaio isnt in jail, REALLY wonder why Klayman isnt (just on the kiddie diddling alone, let alone all the other shit)

MaskedMagician1967
MaskedMagician1967 topcommenter

@dennis20

Why didn't you turn Jaffy over to Phoenix PD? He'd get to meet his hero personally while awaiting trial in Tent City.

Now Trending

Around The Web

From the Vault

 

Loading...