Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Approves 2012 Election Canvass

1353981249_ballotsballots.JPG
Early ballots accounted for 69 percent of all ballots cast in Maricopa County

Maricopa County Recorder Helen Purcell and Elections Director Karen Osborne presented the official 2012 canvass to the Board of Supervisors today, and the BOS approved it after a discussion of the controversy over the late vote count.

Overall, turnout was slightly down this year compared with 2008, with 76.51 percent of registered county voters participating in the 2012 general election versus 79.76 percent in 2008.

See also:
-Joe Arpaio Still Won, Arizona Vote Count Over
-Maricopa County Democratic Party Chair Ann Wallack Not Running for Re-Election

One reason for our two week vote count (about the same as 2008, BTW): The popularity of early ballots continues to grow, with earlies accounting for 69 percent of all county votes cast in 2012.

Compare that to 2008, when earlies accounted for 55 percent of all votes cast.

There was a larger number of provisionals cast in this election, 122,524 in total, a 22.7 percent increase over the number of provisionals cast in 2008.

Of the 2012 total, 22,840 provisionals were not counted because they did not past muster, for a variety of reasons, such as being cast in the wrong precinct. That's an 18.6 spoilage rate.

Which is down from 2008, according to an ACLU report on provisional ballots I've cited previously.

In 2008, almost 30 percent of all provisionals cast were not counted. Many were tossed because of an Arizona law requiring all provisionals to be cast in the correct precinct.

Interestingly, according to the ACLU report, 7.23 percent of all county ballots cast were cast provisionally in 2008.

By my calculation, 8.8 percent of all ballots cast in 2012 were cast provisionally.

So, yes, there were more provisional ballots cast in this election, but as a percentage of total votes cast, it's not that large of an increase.


Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help
11 comments
leonardclark
leonardclark

Again...I thank my friend Stephen Lemons but...there is a rotten fish in Denmark...err..Maricopa county and telling us to not believe our lying eyes or our lying noses about the stench emanating from Maricopa county officials Osborne and Purcell just won't cut it. I had a personal meeting today with Karen Osborne and...she is a very nice little old lady...the kind of person you just hate to challenge but...that's not an excuse to be a push over now... I agree with Dennis and the others here. This needs to be thoroughly and meticulously investigated so that it won't happen again. The usual excuses just don't work anymore. I will have more details on my brief meeting with Karen Osborne later on. And...thank you Mr. Lemons, you are still one of my favorite investigative reporters who...like Dennis has put his personal safety and well being on the line many times before.

So what....I have a disagreement my good friend Mr. Lemons but....I'm not going to let that start a neurotic hate fest like the whole Penzone controversy did. I still believe Mr. Penzone was wrongly smeared and I won't be a part of that by repeating the same kind of behaviour against a reporter who has put his life on the line to many times against fascists like Arpaio to bring "the truth" out. Thanks to my other friends who are stating their opinions as the others have done without smearing each other.Leonard ClarkMaricopa county and Arizona resident11-27-12

Exodus2221
Exodus2221

I think a lot of the angst had to do with mistrust.  Why should we trust a county reporter that sends out misinformation in Spanish and takes takes weeks to get the vote counted?  Why should we trust the fairness of an electoral system that makes people wait in line for hours to vote, particularly in lower-income neighborhoods?

dennis20
dennis20 topcommenter

Lemons states "There were 59,623 people who had requested early ballots, did not return them, but showed up at the polls to vote. They had to vote provisionally."

Did not return them or never got them? 

and 7,215 people tried to vote who were not registered to vote? 

Are you fucking kidding me?  Either  7,215 people commtitted a felony or something is really fucking wrong.

When do we get to find out who sent out the wrong voting date in Spanish? 

Never? Are we not allowed to know anything about that?  

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

so every 4 years during the presidential and sheriff elections we have redistricting problems that cause ballots to be pitched? why doesnt this happen during the election years that arent for pres or sheriff? i dont believe this is why Arpaio won though (i know the voters tend to lean toward the retarded) but it sure doesnt help their case of saying there isnt anything hinky happening. with a problem that only occurs during certain elections and not others, they really cant blame people for coming up with conspiracy theorys. coincidences can only occur so many times before its no longer a coincidence and becomes a pattern

youproductsucks
youproductsucks

@leonardclark personal safety at risk?  You bunch of drama queens sound no different than arpaio claiming his life has been threatened.

youproductsucks
youproductsucks

@dennis20 Someone already fell on the proverbial sword over the typo in spanish.  Quit your whining, you sound like a petulant child.  Redistricting allowed the Dems to win in many more precincts than deserved in Az.  You have nothing to complain about.

arizonaeagletarian
arizonaeagletarian

@danzigsdaddy Indeed. Failure to learn and properly anticipate can rightfully be construed as negligence in certain types of situations. The question, as I see it, is -- how and why did they not properly anticipate and prepare for this election? 

Can you imagine how much chaos there would have been if GOP lawyers that wanted the courts to disqualify the IRC maps had succeeded?

dennis20
dennis20 topcommenter

@youproductsucks @dennis20  Who fell on "the proverbial sword" over the wrong date sent out in spanish? Answer: No one. It was discovered by someone who received it and Purcell apologized. Thats not an investigation as to who did it, how or why. You're a dumb-ass Jack.  You are also still a coward. 

leonardclark
leonardclark

@youproductsucks @dennis20 

Well that's funny my name is Leonard Clark and yet you whine hiding behind a pseudonym.  It's easy to spout mis-truths and call people names when you don't have intestinal fortitude to tell us who you are. Again....my name is Leonard Clark, I don't have to hide behind a fake name  :)

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Loading...