Ken Bennett Says 277,011 Votes Left Statewide, 168,000 in Maricopa County

picresized_1352874947_photo (5).jpg
46,000 early ballots, like these, remain to be counted in Maricopa County, along with 122,000 provisionals

Maricopa County's long march toward a final vote count slogs on, with county Recorder Helen Purcell announcing late Tuesday afternoon that 47,351 early ballots had been tabulated.

Purcell's statement noted that "approximately 46,000 early ballots still remain to be processed for tabulation."

The provisional vote count is still at 122,000.

See also:
-Ken Bennett Says 342,936 Ballots Left, 215K from Maricopa County

Before the county released its latest numbers, Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett's office issued a press release stating that "an estimated 324,362 early and provisional ballots" remain statewide.

But that statement did not include the county's Tuesday update. If you subtract what the county processed today from the SOS numbers, it comes to a total of 277,011 earlies and provisionals remaining.

MCSALLY 137,339 49.79
BARBER 137,993 50.03

The only race left to watch closely is the Ron Barber-Martha McSally contest in the Second Congressional District. Barber, a Dem, leads GOPer McSally by 654 votes, a scant 0.24 percent, as of Tuesday evening, according to the SOS website.

(Note: The vote count is updated throughout the day, and may vary from what you see by the time you read this post.)

The Barber and McSally camps have been in court recdently, duking it out over 130 provisionals from Cochise County.

The Associated Press recently reported that both sides have come to an agreement on how the ballots are to be processed.



My Voice Nation Help
9 comments
jbrooks91
jbrooks91

I registered in July having just moved to AZ. When I attempted to vote in the primary, I was given a provisional ballot because my name was not on the polling place roster. I had not requested an perminent early  ballot and I voted at my precinct on election day. The poll worker admitted to me that  new registrations were not recorded on the poll rosters. Even though the Maricopa County elections website showed that I was registered, I was made to fill out a provisional. Luckily this was corrected by the general election for me, but I believe that this "delay" in recording valid registrations is a loophole designed to suppress the vote of newly registered voters most of whom would be either young or hispanic. I don't buy that 122k provisionals were generated by confused voters.

ip4unot
ip4unot

Thank you, Stephen, for the reasonable report thus far.

 

I'm just now off the phone with a "John", at the Maricopa Cty tabulation center.  He was very helpful but I was very P.O.'d that I'm having to call to bitch about provisional ballots because I keep hearing that they are never even counted.  Of the 121,000 provisionals yet to count as of this writing, per, again, John...virtually all of them are from "people who requested Permanent Early Voting but showed up at the polls to vote anyway".

 

Huh?  That sounds like bullshit to me.  Can this be explained?

 

Paul in Phoenix

MaskedMagician1967
MaskedMagician1967

Goddamn it Stauffer, you should have withdrawn your name from the race for MCSO shurf.

 

As for Flake, he's just that: a flake. Carmona offers Arizonans the best choice and it's based on his resume. He knows more about healthcare, women's healthcare, taxes, immigration, etc. than Flake.

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

 @MaskedMagician1967 just because Penzone is behind the amount Stauffer drew, doesnt mean he would have got all those votes though. there are people who voted Stauffer simply because they will not vote Dem. if Penzone lost by half or a third of Stauffers votes then it might be a little more realistic to blame him

MaskedMagician1967
MaskedMagician1967

 @danzigsdaddy I still think Stauffer should have withdrawn his name from the candidacy when it became apparent to both him and us that he wasn't serious about trying to unseat the Old Fool.

 

Stauffer's votes could have gone to Penzone and the MCSO shurf would actually have something to worry about.

 

Then again, a recall of the MCSO shurf should be in order as soon as he fucks up again.

danzigsdaddy
danzigsdaddy topcommenter

 @MaskedMagician1967 as the votes are being finally counted though, Joe's lead is becoming less of a sweep and more of a squeek though. (sadly, i dont think the count will end in Penzones favor though)

Einstein
Einstein

 @MaskedMagician1967  @danzigsdaddy It is quite possible that some voters are true independents (not wolves in sheep's clothing) and voted for Stauffer because they do not believe in Arpaio or Penzone.  Some people choose to not vote for donkeys or elephants or any other animals that have been dirty business as usual for far too long.   

jonnyquest
jonnyquest topcommenter

@MaskedMagician1967 @danzigsdaddy The thing that would put wind in the sails of a recall is a ruling against Arpaio in Melendres. A DOJ victory would follow. THEN a recall would get legs. If a respected Republican law enforcement type would stand up, Arpaio's days would be numbered. Tim Dorn of Gilbert, are you listening?

Now Trending

Around The Web

From the Vault

 

Loading...