Joe Arpaio "Helps" Childhelp: Nonprofit Takes Blood Money Despite 501c3 Status (w/Update)

@Tommy_Collins

 I will gladly call your bluff.  I won't post my donation, but I will make sure you receive the proof necessary to "double" my contribution.  I make it a practice to contribute, I assure you that if you're a man of your word, your promised portion will hurt.

Phony eh?  must have hit a nerve.  guilt settling in?

 @yourproductsucks

 I've stated before, and will again, I will donate to Childhelp after the election. I will double YOUR donation if you have the fortitude to post it here. And, again, I will encourage both of my friends to do so, as well. Now, go spread your mush on someone else. It's not effective with me. You are as phony as the Easter Bunny.

 @Tommy_Collins I wouldn't know as I have no direct connection with Child Help.  They are the one's victimized by your bully campaign.  The children for whom they serve are the victims of your bully campaign.

Revel in the spoils, it serves you well.  We will never know the extent of damage your noble cause can be attributed to nor the specific people who will have to go without because of a lack of funding due to your campaign.  I guess that will make it easier for you to sleep, after all, not being able to identify the ramifications of your choice.

Regardless of the motives arpaio might have had (and it can't immediately be assumed they were as negative as you all would prefer them to be) he certainly would have raised money that otherwise would not have been received.

 @MaskedMagician1967 Its awesome you've opened your house to two sickly relatives!  Or is it their house...

You said you were trying to get into the Air Force.  I would guess that means you want to get in, right?  Why else would you be trying?

 @yourproductsucks I just wanna make sure I'm doing everything by the book so that I have an airtight case against Sonoran Alliance. That is the reason for my request for legal counsel. Since I am not a Bar certified lawyer, I have to be even more careful.

I help my two sick relatives because that is what family does. Help in time of need.

If I want to go into the Air Force I will.

Anything else you wanna waste my time on YPS?

 @yourproductsucks  Alliance is an entirely accurate term for it.  They put Joe on their website and he sent out e-mail soliciting donations on their behalf.  If you define alliance as the Oxford Dictionaries does, "a union or association formed for mutual benefit, especially between countries or organizations" then Joe and Childhelp formed an alliance for their mutual benefit - he gets positive publicity and they get donations.  Not a stretch at all - to the contrary its an entirely accurate description of what appears to have occurred.

 @LegitQuestions alliance?  that's a bit of a stretch.  Typically your comments are objective and intelligible.  Weak moment?

 @MaskedMagician1967 You are right.  I did say that, right after you claimed you'd been busy getting records subpoenaed reference your "sonoran alliance" issue.  It's ironic that  in the same thread you are begging your lil buddy flyer to use his "attorney" (also fictional) to get those same subpoena's you had earlier stated you were working on.

You are a chronic liar, Jason.  It's no wonder you help your two elderly sick relatives (in their home of course) and can't get accepted in the Air Force.

 @yourproductsucks  Actually, their alliance with Joe in the middle of a campaign made them partisan. 

So sorry that I had other obligations that I needed to fulfill on Monday.

BTW, according to you, "you don't have subpoena power."

You made that statement, not me. This is the norm for you. Spewing mush.

@MaskedMagician1967

"I'll have a subpoena for your name, email address and ISP come Monday from Maricopa County Superior Court. 

Don't like it? Try and stop me fool. I dare you."

You made the statement, not me.  You knew what your real responsibilities were for Monday, not me.  This is the norm for you.

 @yourproductsucks Gee, sorry YPS. I actually have a job that I was at the entire day. So sorry you think I "lied".

 @MaskedMagician1967 You supported the campaign to defame the non partisan, non profit child help organization.  As you said in a previous statement regarding arpaio and his perceived hypocrisy, you have NO POSITION to be judging me when it's your position that took money from this organization.  Most of you are blustering idiots who won't put your money in to back your quick, lazy e-mail spree.

What's my name and email and ISP, Jason?  It's Tuesday.  You claimed you'd get it yesterday.  Another lie?  Say it ain't so!

 @Tommy_Collins  Politicians kiss babies.  It's not a new concept.  Your position is nothing more than sour grapes because the candidate you dislike is engaging in the same activity every other candidate, including Penzone, is doing.

Shame on you for taking funds away from a noble organization.

 @yourproductsucks  @Eleanor_Holguin

 Arpaio was using Childhelp as a venue for making his image more appealing to those who know what a nasty asshole he really is. He couldn't give a damn how much Childhelp has in the bank. Show me ONE receipt where he personally has donated to Childhelp and I will double it and encourage all my friends to do so, as well.

YPS, you should be ashamed you're defending this action as the old bastard hides behind child victims to garner votes.

 @yourproductsucks Thanks for the laugh.

 @Eleanor_Holguin Don't you Nanny McPhee me ,Eleanor!

 @yourproductsucks If it is true that they dropped Arpaio's name I will donate money to them. As I will challenge all who said they wouldn't to do also.

Yes, I don't like Arpaio and him being a hypocrite makes me cringe. It really brings back some memories to me I would sometimes like to forget.

I like that you stood up for the organization.You're a good guy and I think people are finally beginning to realize that. My work here is almost done.......

 @yourproductsucks  Because Arpaio helping them appears to violate federal tax code.

This comes straight from irs.gov.

"To be tax-exempt under 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code, an organization must be organized and operated exclusively for exempt purposes as set forth in Section 501 (c) (3) and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual.

In addition, it may not be an action organization. It may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates."

 @Tommy_Collins The Old Fool's an asshole all the time.

 @MaskedMagician1967Impossible to answer, I'm afraid.