Joe Arpaio Stooge Mike Stauffer a "Republican Candidate," Writes West Kenyon, Campaign Manager (w/Update)

staugfdsa.JPG
Facebook
Way to tell it like it is, West...

See also: Joe Arpaio-Wannabe Mike Stauffer Flips Out, Calls Non-Threat "Vaguely Threatening"
See also: Joe Arpaio, DeeDee Blase, and Her Shrill Attacks on Paul Penzone
See also: Stauffer Must Exit Sheriff's Race or Forever Be the Goat
See also: Mike Stauffer's Third-Wheel Bid for Sheriff May Keep Arpaio in Office

For all of the so-called "progressives" out there who've been hoodwinked into believing former Scottsdale Police Lieutenant Mike Stauffer has arrived on a white donkey to save them from mean ol' Sheriff Joe Arpaio and the perils of partisan politics, I offer the above reminder that both Stauffer and his campaign manager West Kenyon are lifelong Reagan Republicans.

Stauffer is running as an Independent for sheriff, but he's no lefty. In fact, as was pointed out recently by a commenter to my last blog post about Stauffer-supporter DeeDee Blase, Kenyon was once chair of the Legislative District 7 Republicans, where Stauffer served under him as secretary.

WestKenyon.JPG
Facebook
GOPers all? From left to right, ex-LD7 GOP chair West Kenyon, DeeDee Blase, and Mike Stauffer

It's a mystery why a small handful of supposed libs have glommed on to Stauffer and even Blase to such a degree. I can only speculate that it's Darwinism at work, a la Wendy Northcutt. Though more and more, even these L-words are waking up before Stauffer leads them, lemming-like, over the cliff into four more years of Arpaio.

Update 9/12/12 6:51 PM:

Seems West changed his mind about Stauffer being a Republican. Check it out.

westkenyon44444.JPG
Facebook



Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
64 comments
alwesley
alwesley

As I said before, Stauffer is just another Olivia Cortez.  He is working for Sheriff Joe to split the vote.  If he didn't want Joe to win he would have bowed out already.  He has no chance to win and neither does Penzone if he stays in.  If he somehow is really trying to beat Arpaio and is not willing to step aside for Penzone then he is willing to allow Arpaio to stay in power just for pride.  If that is so then he is the worst friend of people who want Arpaio out.  He will be hated for what he is doing by everyone except Arpaio.  Arpaio will be giving him a big kiss for keeping him in power in November. 

matt
matt

OMG!! this rag just keeps getting better and better! I can't wait to see who turns out to be an alien from outter space!  Could it be Stauffer, West, DeeDee .....  oh wait .... maybe one of them has been impregnated by an alien in a recent UFO siting! this is awesome!! how exciting!!  Stauffer must really have you shitting your pants!!

ExpertShot
ExpertShot topcommenter

For all you liberals out there who think the State of Arizona has the right to make laws regulating immigration - here's the CONSERVATIVE viewpoint from the U.S. Constitution:

 

ARTICLE I,Section 8 : The Congress shall have Power To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization . . . throughout the United States. 

 

So all you fake conservatives out there - acknowledge that you are taking a liberal position in advocating for the State of Arizona to make laws regarding immigration!BTW - Neither a liberal or conservative position is "bad" in my view, just not acknowledging your slant on this issue is not only "bad" it's ignorant as hell!

QstionEvythng
QstionEvythng

Lemons - thanks for the attribution.  I still haven't heard you reconcile how you were all over Stauffer as a candidate in August 2011  but have completely soured on him since.  Were you one of the progessives who were "hoodwinked" in 2011?  I still think Stauffer is the spoiler and intend to vote for Penzone - but I'd be interested in hearing how you reconcile your current stance with your  support for Stauffer this time last year.

anacleta
anacleta

I'm new to Arizona and November will mark my first time voting for America's Toughest Sheriff, Joe Arpaio. As I cast my vote for Joe, I will be picturing you shabby little liberals wailing and gnashing your teeth at Joe's election to a 6th term. I'll be looking forward to watching you openly weep as the election results and reactions are televised later in the evening.

gpscentral
gpscentral

A vote for Penzone is a vote for Arpaio.

gpscentral
gpscentral

Stauffer has never made a secret of this. Hardly a news flash and certainly a mute point since every candidate that has entered the race so far has been a republican. Stauffer didn't switch parties, he LEFT his party. Penzone was a Republican, then he was an Independent, finally he morphed into a Democrat. Unlike Stauffer, he didn't leave his party, he switched parties.

QstionEvythng
QstionEvythng

 @ExpertShot

 ExpertShot - none of the liberals are taking the position that the State of Arizona has the right to make immigration law.  The liberal position is, generally, that immigration is a federal issue and the fix needs to be a federal fix.  The liberal position is that whether the fix is tighter border countrol and greater deportation or DREAM Act or even amnesty, the fix must be a federal fix, not a local one, 

 

Brewer, Pearce, Arpaio and our Republican state legislators (along with the Kansas Secretary of State who wrote SB10170) are essentially the only ones that have taken the position that the State of Arizona can mandate immigration policy to the feds.

Tommy_Collins
Tommy_Collins

 @LegitQuestions

 Interesting question. I can't answer for Mr. Lemons, but I can offer my thoughts.

 

I was 'hoodwinked' by Mike Stauffer last year. I attended a couple of his neighborhood meetings and I felt he was genuinely interested in running for sheriff. I signed his petition to run on the ballot as an Independent. I've watched and listened to his campaign since both Penzone and Rowan announced their candidacies and I've seen pretty much nothing from the Stauffer campaign, and he certainly hasn't shown the monetary backing or political endorsements that Penzone has received. I've talked to both Stauffer and Penzone and I am honestly more impressed by Penzone than I am by Stauffer.

 

Stauffer has the education and command administrative experience with a professional police organization, but he seems lacking in political prowess and command bearing.

 

Penzone has twenty years experience with the Phoenix Police Department, having retired as Sergeant, not as a commander, with indirect supervisory and adminstrative experiences, with his last assignment (I believe) as being a spokesman for PPD. As recently as yesterday I have spoken with Penzone and I feel he is very serious about his quest to become sheriff in Maricopa County. He seems to realize the enormity of the task of being sheriff and the absolute need for the appropriate people in his command staff to handle the adminstrative end of things while he takes care of the public and political aspects of the position.

 

Penzon seems motivated to actually become elected as sheriff and to take on the monumental task of cleaning up what appears to be a generally dirty and corrupt organization.

 

I'm not sure what motivates Stauffer to stay in the campaign, other than his history as a former supporter of the MCSO shurf while active in LD7 with the Republican party, with West Kenyon.

 

As an Independent voter, I seriously doubt that Stauffer, running as an Independent, can swing the needs votes to him to beat the MCSO shurf and Penzone.

 

I think Penzone, however, has the command bearing and political aptitude to garner those swing votes.

 

If Stauffer remains in the race I have to wonder if it's because he is hoping to join the MCSO staff if the MCSO shurf is re-elected, meaning he was a sham candidate from day one, and I was a fool for believing him. I hope that isn't the case.

 

I just checked the Stauffer for Sheriff web site and don't see any mention that Stauffer has retired from SPD, as he indicated he would be doing, to run 'full time' for the position as of August 29th.

 

His FaceBook page also has no mention that he has retired.

 

From the perspective of a former supporter this behavior by Stauffer is very strange, indeed.

 

I think Paul Penzone will indeed be the New Sheriff.

ExpertShot
ExpertShot topcommenter

 @anacleta Is it liberal or conservative to think that the Federal Government is in charge of immigration policy?  Hmmm. Let's look that up.  Oh yeah - Looky there - It's in the Constitution.  So, that would mean that following the Constitution is a Conservative thing to do RIGHT!  Ignorance is no virtue Dude!

 

QstionEvythng
QstionEvythng

 @anacleta

If Arpaio wins, we will be weeping for the ongoing assault of the U.S. Constitution and on the taxpayers of Maricopa County that will continue to occur under Arpaio's incompetent reign as Sheriff.

seekingjustice2
seekingjustice2

You know that you have to report and register in Arizona, all child molesters do?  But, as long as Joe is in office your safe, but I would not count on him winning this time around, the secret is out of the bag.

bobunf
bobunf

 @anacleta It is most admirable that you have such empathy for the poor unfortunate people who happen to have committed major thefts (think Robin Hood), child molestations and rapes (such unfeeling and draconian laws), and murders.- we all know there's more than one side to a story.  Believe me, Joe Arpaio is your man.  Just look at the statistics.

 

From 2002 to 2009 in the jurisdiction of Maricopa County’s Sheriff VIOLENT CRIME rates INCREASED 58%.  But in Phoenix such crime DECREASED 14%, in Mesa DECREASED 31%, in Scottsdale DECREASED15%, in Tempe DECREASED 26%.  

 

Maricopa has become a “sanctuary county” for burglars, thieves, rapists, child molesters and murderers.  And, anacleta, you can expect our Sheriff Joe to keep up the good work.  Ordinary people may not be as safe, but some sacrifices must be made to protect our criminal class.  

 

dennis20
dennis20 topcommenter

 @anacleta  Thanks for voting for a man who lets children get molested while he brags about his pink underwear.  You must be really proud of yourself.

luisoncln
luisoncln

 @anacleta Your time for self glorification will soon come to an end. 

 

bobunf
bobunf

 @gpscentral Gail, I think you are disingenuous.  You know perfectly well that that statement is untrue.  You don't really expect people to believe that you think a man with no money, no volunteers, no party or other backing, no plan to win can get more votes than Arpaio.

 

When was the last time an "independent" won a statewide office in Arizona or a County wide office in Maricopa or any seat in the legislature.  An independent with o money, no volunteers, no party or other backing, no campaign except whining?  

 

Try never   

QstionEvythng
QstionEvythng

 @gpscentral

 Absolutely disagree with you.  Penzone has the machine, the money and the momentum.  With the exception of the vigorous defense he gets on this board, Stauffer seems to be sitting on his hands and is neither raising donor funds nor effectively campaigning.  Causes me to think you have it backwards - A vote for Penzone is a vote for the organized opposition to Arpaio with the chance to win and a vote for Stauffer is a vote for an ineffective independent with little likelihood of winning.

saltywench
saltywench

 @gpscentral Stauffer didn't leave the Republican Party.  He's running as an Independent because he didn't want to waste resources running against Arpaio in a primary.  It is a strategy other candidates who ran against Arpaio did as well in both the 2004 and 2008 election cycle.

GreenHornet
GreenHornet

 @gpscentral How did Stauffer leave his party if he was and still is a republican? good try, west.

gpscentral
gpscentral

 @dennis20

 She didn't sabatage the recall Pearce effort. She started the FIRST recall then Parraz came along with his effort. They talked about joining forces because Parraz knew she had an donor in the wings with a nice hefty check to help with the recall. Then he told her she could not mention SB1070 or immigration. Those things are important to DeeDee. She told him forget it. It was then Parraz made her enemy. He isn't as pure as he'd like you all to believe. How about that Dennis Gilman?

 

ExpertShot
ExpertShot topcommenter

@QstionEvythng @ExpertShot I guess you miss my point so I'll address it directly - The word conservative means something.  The word Liberal means something.  Look them before going any further.  You don't get to redefine those terms because there is a position you agree with, you consider yourself liberal and therefore it is a liberal position.  Recognize that following the US Constitution closely is a CONSERVATIVE position.  The Liberal position would be to construe the Constitution loosely or ignore it altogether.  It is in the US Constitution that the Federal Government makes the laws regarding immigration - THEREFORE, it is a conservative position, not a liberal one, which says that a State or Locality can NOT make immigration policy on its own.  One has a liberal or conservative VIEWPOINT on certain issues - you are not a liberal because you say you are.  You have conservative views on some issues and liberal views on other issues.


gpscentral
gpscentral

 @Tommy_Collins  @LegitQuestions

 Stauffer is, indeed, retired from Scottsdale Police Dept. He had a very secure job so your analysis that he needs a job and will be hired by Arpaio if he is re elected is ridiculous. Isn't it Penzone who now needs a job? In fact, your entire post is flawed with conjecture, general statements. You really should go to his FB page and ask him the questions you ask here so you can get the answers from the horses mouth. I guarantee you he will answer you. Ask him why, in the past he had supported Arpaio though his LD.....ask him why he left the GOP, ask him all the hard questions you all like to throw around here. But you won't because you don't want answers, you want to fuel biased rhetoric .  Be specific, other than you think Penzone has "command bearing", whatever that is since he has only supervised 6 people, what are his qualifications?  He's not prepared to reform MCSO, you all just want to replace one political party's influence with another.

artfag
artfag

 @ExpertShot I can think of 20+ million reasons why the federal government is not "in charge" of our illegal alien problem. I think you meant that it's their "responsibility," which they've all but officially abdicated.

gpscentral
gpscentral

 @LegitQuestions

 You have it right. Penzone has the machine (democratic party) behind him. Consequently, he will be eaten up and run by the machine. You do know Independents have more registered voters than the democrats right? And you do know the democrats lost 52,000 voters last year right? Now there's a disturbing trend.

gpscentral
gpscentral

 @mootpost

 Oh my goodness, you are correct, moot is right. What did I say mute? Now I can't find the comment, Thank you for the correction.

gpscentral
gpscentral

 @GreenHornet

 He's not still a Republican. He's running as in Independent, there are some pesky rules about that you know. Stephen Lemons is purposely misleading people on that score. Maybe he's got his shorts in a twist because Stauffer won't give him the time of day. BTW this isn't West, my name is Gail Shoultes. I also find it interesting that Lemons would insult me that way. I am voting for Obama, Carmona, Lilia Alvarez, etc etc. Because I don't agree to vote for the democratic candidate for sheriff because he's not qualified to reform MCSO, suddenly I'm a "supposed lib" and a lemming. What a crock from the hack.

bobunf
bobunf

 @gpscentral  @dennis20 Gail, stop with the factually inaccurate  nonsense.  Dee Dee CLAIMED to have a "donor in the wings with a nice hefty check," but nobody in CBA ever believed it, and it wasn't true.  By the way, she didn't make the claim until AFTER CBA had been collecting signatures for months and was near achieving the required number.  

CBA publicly announced preparations for the recall weeks before Dee Dee filed.  That did catch us by surprise.  That she deliberately filed first, without collaboration, and with utter disdain for the consequences were not actions that would endear her to anyone who actually wanted to recall Pearce.

 

After the signatures were turned in and the recall election scheduled, we begged Dee Dee for the contact information on the signatures she had gathered in order to go after those votes against Pearce.  At the time I thought she refused because she was embarrassed by the small number of signatures she had gathered, after publicly suggesting the number was about 5,000.  

 

Now, I'm not so sure.  Everything she did during the recall made it tougher to get Pearce out of office - from filing a separate recall, trying to push the SB1070 issue, sparing with CBA and refusing any help -monetary, volunteers, contacts, signatures, logistics - not one penny, not one minute, not one voter to chase, nothing.  

 

I didn't know about this disgustingly dirty deal, but that would certainly have hurt a lot.  CBA was, and is, respected and successful, in part, because we didn't and don't lie, cheat and steal.

 

Was she really deliberately giving Pearce a hand?  Like she is with Arpaio in this election?

 

dennis20
dennis20 topcommenter

 @gpscentral  She wanted to be the spokesperson and he said forget it and thank God he did or Pearce would still be Senate President as DeeDee Blase wanted.   Parazz's recall unofficially started in Novemeber of 2010.  I was there. Where were you? 

dennis20
dennis20 topcommenter

 @gpscentral Oh bullshit.  DeeDee has only used the immigration issue to get followers. She has NEVER done a damn thing for the migrant. Parazz campaigned against 1070 as a senate candidate in 2010.  In fact he was the first to organize any actions against it in early 2010 before it was even out of commitee.  I WAS THERE. DEEDEE WAS NOT!  As for the recall-She knew Parazz was going to file. Everyone did and I know who told here. She rushed down and filed first  to tamper with the obviuos real effort.   She then lied and claimed she picked up 5,000 signatures her first weekend. (no one ever saw those) She made the Pearce recall harder and she did it knowing she would. She deliberately created confusion.  And what she tried to pull off in September is illegal and it may even get investigated so tell her to lawyer up.  (she may need someone more qualifyed than her rich hubby)  

 

When are you cowards going to address her Black Ops Mission email? Not one of you chickenshits will mention it including Stauffer, DeeDee, Lou Lernor or Robert McDonald Jr...None of you cowards have an honest bone in your body. 

GreenHornet
GreenHornet

 @gpscentral  @dennis20 bullshit. blase wanted all the glory, none of the work. she and democrat ronald macdonald tried to organize petitions. they can't organize shit for shinola. yeah, parraz had more money, more organization, more education, more brains. who do u blame for that? parraz? gimme a break.

bobunf
bobunf

 @gpscentral  @dennis20  @GreenHornet  @anacleta It's dirty, dirty politics.  While poll watching the day of the recall, I had a conversation with a lady in which I explained that, regardless of agreement or disagreement with Pearce's polices, merely the way in which he ran his campaign - stealing campaign signs, lying on his signs, lying to voters about Olivia Cortez and trying to cheat Latinos out of their vote -  all this was, in itself, enough to take Pearce out of office.

 

Then, I was proud to be able to truthfully say, "We don't lie, cheat or steal."

 

Dee Dee is a liar, a cheater and a thief.   It reflects on Stauffer; just as Pearce's niece carrying petitions for Cortez reflected badly on Pearce.

 

It's parallel: regardless of agreement or disagreement with Stauffer's polices, merely the way in which he is running his campaign is, in itself, enough to not vote for him.

gpscentral
gpscentral

 @dennis20  @GreenHornet  @anacleta Oh wow, the crime of the century. I'll wait to see how many years she gets in the pen for that one. What's the difference. Stealing campaign signs is a crime too and that goes on everyday.

QstionEvythng
QstionEvythng

 @gpscentral

 

I was referring to an active campaign with volunteers who are out working for him, along with an established political party to support him.  The reality is that an independent, regardless of how well qualified, doesn't have the benefit of local or national support to draw from and will always be at a significant disadvantage. 

 

Most independents are like me - refugees from political parties that have moved either too far right (for former Republicans) or too far left (for former Democrats) for their comfort level.  We are stuck in the middle between the two parties.  That doesn't mean, however, that an independent candidate is automatically appealing to us.  I'm not voting for Stephen Rollins for President simply because he's an independent candidate in the presidential race.  That's a rediculous notion.  Just as rediculous a notion as stating that a party candidate "will be eaten up and run by the machine."

 

The other day I wondered out loud if Stauffer is Olivia Cortes v2.0.  After further thought, I'm willing to consider calling him Ralph Nader v2.0 (probably v8.0. based on the number of times Nader ran and lost).  The reason is this: in the 2000 presidential election Nader was sincere but delusional in his run for President, but the100,000 votes he received in Florida essentially put Bush in office (Bush beat Gore in Florida by 500 votes).  Ralph Nader v2.0 may ultimately be a better description than Olivia Cortes v2.0, but I'm not willing to concede yet that Stauffer isn't a sham altogether.

bobunf
bobunf

 @gpscentral  @LegitQuestions Gail, you do know  that "independents" are really Democrats or Republicans who just don't want to tell you, or people who don't care and don't vote.  

 

Calling the Arizona or Maricopa Democratic party a "machine" is totally ridiculous.  I saw a real political machine operate in Chicago in the 1950s and 1960s.  

 

By contrast, the Arizona party is feeble, unable to recruit candidates for vast numbers of offices, with leadership that's been in office, not for decades, but for months.  Largely ignored by candidates, and largely irrelevant to their success or failure.  Completely ignored by office holders, who call the tone, not the other way around.

 

You seem not to realize that you mistake cause and effect.  It's not that the backing of the party causes candidates to win; it's that the party backs candidate who are winners.  It would be rather unproductive to back losers.  

 

Give up the fairy tale demons.

QstionEvythng
QstionEvythng

 @GreenHornet  

 That name calling's not real becoming of you - I hope that there isn't a racial component to it.

bobunf
bobunf

 @gpscentral  @GreenHornet Gail, what part of "Loser" do you not understand?  STAUFFER CAN'T POSSIBLY WIN.  

 

It is a choice: Arpaio, Penzone or don't vote.  

 

Voting for Stauffer, writing in Mickey Mouse, tearing up your ballot - they are all the same as not voting at all.  Just save the ink and don't bother.  

 

It doesn't matter what qualifications Stauffer has.  He could be superman.  But HE CAN'T WIN.  

 

It doesn't matter what defects Penzone has; he's light years better than Arpaio.  Almost anybody would be.  My dog would be.  

 

Do you really want to enable another 4 years of this shameful reign of terror?  And how will an Arpaio victory affect future elections?  Like for Governor, the statewide offices and the legislature in 2014?  Not for the good.  Back to kookdom.  

 

gpscentral
gpscentral

 @bobunf  @GreenHornet

 I believe Stauffer is considerably more qualified. He has a master's degree in Organizational Management and he is an online instructor for the College of Criminal Justice and Security at the University of Phoenix. He also teaches Constitutional Law for Law Enforcement at the AZ Law Enforcement Academy since 2000. I don't know where you get the idea I want Arpaio for four more years. I don't for all the same reasons you mentioned. Penzone didn't even have what it took to finish college.

Stauffer has command experience, Penzone does not. Stauffer is well versed in field operations, detention, constitutional rights and he can and will close tent city. In doing so, he will eliminate human suffering. Penzone says it can't be closed because you'd have to build another facility and it costs too much. Stauffer says we have room to move inmates into existing facilities. All this is part of his vision to save us tax dollars. Stauffer has a complete plan outlined on his website and FB page, Penzone does not. In fact, I can't get a straight answer out of anyone about his qualifications. All I get is an answer that sounds much like reading it off his campaign brochure. Penzone has neither the plan nor the know how to reform MCSO. For the democrats to know that Penzone partnered with the local dem party to circumvent the primary process and to support that flawed candidate is a disgrace. I am for the most qualified man to run MCSO not a bandaid. I do not believe that Penzone is the only one with a chance to win, that's just Parraz style propaganda and nothing more than an opinion.

gpscentral
gpscentral

 @GreenHornet  @gpscentral

 Monkey is not an original Greenhornet. We heard that all the time in school. Please try again for a better insult. You, however, are still a coward hiding behind a superhero name...lol.

 

bobunf
bobunf

 @gpscentral  @GreenHornet You must know that you are throwing your vote away.  Stuaffer doesn't have a chance in a million of winning.  He'll not get 10% of the vote.  

 

Why would you want Arpaio to get four more years to pander to fear and the worst instincts of people, have courts routinely find him violating the United States Constitution, run up gargantuan legal costs for the taxpayers of the County, appeal to voyeuristic sadism, and do a truly terrible job at law enforcement, making Maricopa a sanctuary city for thieves, rapists, child molestors and murderers?  Why?

 

You can't believe that Penzone will be as bad as Arpaio without being delusional.  Just for a start, Penzone won't have the power of Arpaio.  And it's inconceivable that he has the same level of corruption, incompetence and sadism as Arpaio. 

Bnbk
Bnbk

 @gpscentral  @GreenHornet

 Gail, in the primary you were backing Rowan,Penzone prevailed,now you're backing Stauffer? Your side claims to want Arpaio removed from office and MCSO to be run by a qualified individaul,yet you refuse to back a canidate that actually may have a chance to defeat Arpaio.Do you not think that Penzone is ,by far,better qualified to run MCSO than Arpaio? ........I don't want to start an argument with you and I will not resort to name calling. I am just wondering what your reasoning for your choice is. I know your side is claiming Stauffer is better qualified,but if Arpaio's removal from office is the goal,then supporting the individal with the best chance of victory would be the way to go.That is if Arpaio's defeat is the goal.

GreenHornet
GreenHornet

 @gpscentral  @GreenHornet Are you that monkey-woman? Nice to meet ya. Too bad ur full of shit. Stauffer was a Repug before and will be a Repug again. and if u vote for him monkey-woman u might as well vote Arpie-hole

gpscentral
gpscentral

 @dennis20

 I don't mind talking about her black ops thingy. I thought you had pretty much exhausted it already though.

BlackShadow
BlackShadow

 @dennis20  @gpscentral I personally saw Randy Parraz delivering petitions against SB1070 in March 2010 well before it was passed.

 

And Randy Parraz announced the up and coming recall over a month before DeeDee jumped in to steal the limelight,

gpscentral
gpscentral

 @dennis20  Name calling so soon in the argument? You really should learn to control that nasty temper of yours. It makes you look like you ran totally out of argument when you start with the name calling. The first one that calls the other one a name....loses!

dennis20
dennis20 topcommenter

 @gpscentral  @GreenHornet  Yes. Lets look at those documents. By all means. LETS LOOK. First of all, she only filed a few days before him and it would be mathimatically impossable for her to get 1/2 of the needed signatures in 3 days. She lied and said she got 5,00 in 3 days. No one ever saw those and the few people she snuckered early left her and admitted they never got squat.  Get your facts straight if you want to debate with me or go on DeeDee's page and cry a river. 

 

GreenHornet
GreenHornet

 @gpscentral  @dennis20 wrong, she didn't submit any signatures, dumbass. "You are just another critical coward hiding behind a made up name.." so gpscentral is on ur driver's license?

gpscentral
gpscentral

 @GreenHornet  @dennis20

 Really? Let's look up those recall documents and see who began the first recall. Ha, she had 1/2 of the signatures she needed when Parraz came along and, by the way, Parraz had no money, when he started down that path. DeeDee is hardly lazy so that won't wash either. You are just another critical coward hiding behind a made up name.

Now Trending

Around The Web

From the Vault

 

Loading...