Associated Press Stonewalls on Flubbed Senate Bill 1070 Item

resizeprotester1315072639_blue333 353.JPG
Another pic from July 29: Once again, no one "beating" on the doors, as the AP story insists

Following my column this week regarding the Associated Press' flubbed piece on the sentences received by 13 anti-SB 1070 protesters arrested outside the Fourth Avenue Jail on July 29, 2010, attorney Antonio Bustamante, one of the lawyers for the defendants, wrote the AP asking for a correction or retraction of its inaccurate account.

Bustamante detailed at great length and with tremendous patience why the AP story was inaccurate and why the AP should do something to remedy the situation. The demonstrators were practicing non-violent civil disobedience. None of them were "beating" on the large metal doors of Fourth Avenue's central intake before being arrested by sheriff's deputies, as the AP story reported.

For his efforts, he received a terse reply from Traci Carl, the AP's West Editor, who is based in Phoenix.

"We have looked into your concerns, but have no reason to doubt the validity of the article," she wrote. "Thanks for your interest."

As Bustamante stated in his reply, which is reprinted below, Carl should have reason to doubt the validity of the reporting, but I get the distinct impression that Carl just doesn't give a flip. Her "can't be bothered" attitude flies in the face of the very "news values and principles" posted on AP's Web site, where it states that, "we abhor inaccuracies, carelessness, bias or distortions."

It's important to note that the MCSO's own report on the arrests says nothing about protesters "beating" on the large bay doors of the central intake. And as Bustamante and Sean Larkin, another lawyer for the defendants, have pointed out to me, if this had happened, you can be sure that the prosecutors would have tried to use it against the activists.

But the prosecutors didn't, because it didn't happen.

"The protesters showed passive resistance to the orders [to disperse]," sheriff's office Lieutenant C. Brackman writes in his summary, "and it appeared they wanted to get arrested."

In other words, no door-banging needed.

In my column, I also took issue with the characterization of the number of demonstrators on the streets that day being in the "dozens." In reality, there were hundreds, and it's not just me saying so. The headline for the Arizona Republic's July 30, 2010 piece on the protests reads, "Hundreds protest as law takes effect."

The AP's recent item on the sentencing of the Fourth Avenue 13 was reproduced online and in print in numerous publications nationwide: Huffington Post, Salon.com, Arizona Republic, KTAR, Arizona Capitol Times, The Charlotte Observer, The Idaho Statesman, and CBSAtlanta.com, along with many, many others.

It may have even gone international, as far as I know. I stopped Googling the story after clicking through several pages of links.

This repetition is one reason why the AP's errors should be taken seriously. Also, it's an insult to these demonstrators in particular to suggest that they were anything but non-violent.

Two reporters contributed to this short, 362-word piece: Amanda Lee Myers and Michelle Price. 

It's the job of their editors to correct factual mistakes.

Indeed, the intransigence of the AP's middle management in this instance is telling. I spoke to the AP's Phoenix desk about the item prior to my column running and encountered the same stubborn indifference. Prior to this, e-mails sent to one of the reporters and to the Arizona AP at large were ignored.

I have no faith that Carl will suddenly experience an epiphany and act as she should. She is a gatekeeper for the hive, and as such, it does not behoove her to admit error. To do so undermines the larger media entity and the Borg mindset which is essential to its continued existence.

Still, it's worthy to resist the Borg, and to throw a wrench of doubt into the AP's presumption of infallibility.

So, if you are so inclined, I encourage you to e-mail Carl at TCarl@ap.org, the Arizona AP at aparizona@ap.org, reporter Amanda Myers at amyers@ap.org, and the AP in general at info@ap.org, and ask, simply, why the AP refuses to correct the obvious inaccuracies in its story.

Should you receive any replies, feel free to share them in the comments below.

From: Antonio Bustamante [mailto:antonio_b@qwestoffice.net
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 1:26 PM
To: 'Carl, Traci'
Subject: RE: Inaccuracies in Article re Arizona Immigration Protesters

Ms. Carl:

You state you "have no reason to doubt the validity of the article."  (underlineation added). I provided authoritative "reason to doubt" its validity. It is called evidence. It is frustrating that no information is provided to support the claim that there is no reason to doubt. The response sent to me today is dismissive. It is also unappreciated.

The Associated Press Statement of News Values and Principles appearing on your company's webpage states that the "men and women of The Associated Press .  .  . have gone to great lengths .  .  . to ensure that the news [is] reported quickly, accurately and honestly."  (underlineation added).  The inaccuracy pointed-out in the article in question is patent, yet your e-mail leaves the impression that the A.P. does not want not correct the false information put out to readers.  This is inconsistent with other claims made in the statement of A.P values and principles, e.g., "[W]e abhor inaccuraciescarelessness, bias or distortions."  (bold letters and underlineation added).  Finally, the publicly heralded A.P. values and principles states, "When mistakes are made, they must be corrected - fullyquickly and ungrudgingly."  (underlineaton added).

Please live up to the standards of the journalistic profession and those of your news organization.  "Ungrudgingly" correct the inaccuracy that has been brought to your attention.

Antonio D. Bustamante

Attorney at Law

 

From: Carl, Traci [mailto:TCarl@ap.org
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 8:41 AM
To: antonio_b@qwestoffice.net
Cc: Stokes, Jack; Colford, Paul
Subject:
 FW: Inaccuracies in Article re Arizona Immigration Protesters


We have looked into your concerns, but have no reason to doubt the validity of the article. Thanks for your interest.


Traci Carl

West Editor

The Associated Press


From: Antonio Bustamante [mailto:] 
Posted At: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:15 PM
Posted To: PHE - Phoenix, AZ Bureau Mailbox
Conversation: Inaccuracies in Article re Arizona Immigration Protesters
Subject:
 Inaccuracies in Article re Arizona Immigration Protesters

I am one of the four attorneys who represented protesters about whom the Associated Press issued a piece on August 23, 2011, titled 1 Day in Jail for 13 Arizona Immigration Protesters I must point out a serious factual inaccuracy.  The fourth paragraph states that protesters were "beating on a metal door [of the Fourth Avenue Jail in Phoenix]." This is not what happened, and there was no evidence during the trials that such things ever occurred.

The Defendants conducted what Judge David Seyer described at sentencing as a peaceful demonstration.  They sat or stood in front of a large sally port door located on the north side of the Fourth Avenue Jail in downtown Phoenix.  Five of the defendants were chained to each other.  The others stood with them or sat in front of them.  The defendants were arrested after (1) Maricopa County deputy sheriffs made announcements that they leave and (2) the defendants did not comply.  It is just not a fact that anyone banged on the sally port door or any other jail door.  Had this happened, any perpetrator(s) would have immediately been stopped or arrested by the many deputies present.

The persons who stood trial were ordained members of the clergy, university graduate and undergraduate students, educators, social workers and community organizers.  At sentencing, Judge Seyer commended them for their courtroom demeanor and for the peaceful nature of their act of social disobedience.  He denied requests by prosecuting attorneys that stiff fines be imposed.  He stated on the record that he saw no purpose in sentencing the 13 convicted defendants to anything harsher than the time they had already served in jail upon being arrested.  A magistrate released them without bond several hours after their arrests.  Although the sentence for each of the 13 was for one day jail, Judge Seyer credited as a full day the hours they had spent in post-arrest custody.

The Fourth Avenue Jail is where police agencies in Maricopa County take arrested persons to be booked and readied for their first court appearance.  The presence of the protester-defendants in front of the jail's north sally port caused law enforcement officers to access the jail through another means of approach on the jail's south side where police vehicles normally exit the facility.

The protest took place on July 29, 2010, the date portions of SB 1070, Arizona's sweeping immigration law, took effect.  The most controversial parts of the law had been enjoined the previous day by the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.  Of the 43 persons arrested during the Fourth Avenue Jail protest, only 15 stood trial.  All of the other 28 cases were dismissed before trial.  Seven of the 28 defendants whose cases were dismissed were reporters and photojournalists just doing their jobs.  Three of the 28 were attorneys present as legal observers.  Two of the 15 who were tried were found not guilty.  Thirteen were convicted but are appealing their convictions.

On behalf of the good people I represented at trial and continue to represent on appeal, I respectfully ask that a retraction or correction be printed by the Associated Press to remedy the misstatement that the protesters were "beating a metal [or any jail] door."

Thank you and I look forward to your reply.

Antonio D. Bustamante

Attorney at Law

1001 N. Central Avenue, Ste. 660

Phoenix, AZ 85004

My Voice Nation Help
18 comments
Dumoudan
Dumoudan

Sherrif Joe is one of a few law enforcement individuals who understands a simple fact: "illegal immigrant" = an individual who is not in the United States legally. Being that the "illegal immigrant" has broken our  (and Barrack Hussien Obwama's) Federal Immigration Laws and entered the United States through illegal means, he / she is subject to a crime and as such, he / she is subject to deportation. Is that difficult to understand?

teknik1200
teknik1200

That "liberal media" is at it again, distorting all things "conservative".

Truth to Power
Truth to Power

How do you bang on doors with your hands in tubes?

MisterEEE
MisterEEE

"The headline for the Arizona Republic's July 30, 2010 piece on the protests reads, "Hundreds protest as law takes effect."

You can't get any more liberally biased than the AZ Republic. They would have said thousands if they felt they could get away with it. I'd believe "The Star" before I'd believe anything in that bird cage liner.

I noticed you gave them a cutesy pie little name "Fourth Avenue 13 ". Do you think this gives them legitamcy. They are just professional demonstrators, bussed in from SoCal.

Ol' Bustamante is flogging this dead horse. Anything to get free publicity. "Hey maybe, I'll be able to raise my rates!"

Jason
Jason

Of course the AP won't correct or retract its story. It's learned real well from Sonoran News, Linda Bentley. and Don Scorchych.

I can guarantee that if the AP started writing stories based on facts, their articles would be worth my time reading.

wherewasi
wherewasi

Somewhat off topic, but know who reads over here and thought you might be interested in the latest from the wing-nut tea-baggers on the Thomas / Aubochon Bar action coming up soon:

http://sonoranalliance.com/201...

Mistalee
Mistalee

Link to the AP article - http://azcapitoltimes.com/news...

The inaccuracies Stephen cites are definitely there, and what I find really interesting is that they are not sourced. In other words, the number of protesters at the event and the "beating on the doors" allegations are reported as incontrovertible fact, with no indication as to who reported either of these claims to the AP.

Sorry, but I´ve covered hard news in my time, and that's some dogshit reporting. And it begs the question, how can this editor say that they have "no reason to doubt the validity of the article" when the claims made have no reported source? What did she check her facts against, the voices in her head?

ArizonaEducator
ArizonaEducator

TCarl@ap.orgPlease retract or correct what is mentioned in the following article: Associated Press Stonewalls on Flubbed Senate Bill 1070 Item - Phoenix News - Feathered BastardI am a college instructor responsible for teaching ethics to my students.  I will not tolerate the breach in your own values and ethics and, if necessary, I will include such breach in my instruction this semester.  Over 100 of my students will learn whether you retract or correct it.  You are probably a good "bad example" to use with critical reading classes, as well.

mikefrombisbee
mikefrombisbee

Those who are so arrogant that they can't admit to making mistakes never learn from the ones they make. The Associated Press shows its arrogance by refusing to admit it makes mistakes. 

wherewasi
wherewasi

Nicely said!  I also would have pointed out the poor grammar and spelling and proof-reading skills of some of their writers, but you stayed on topic!

ArizonaEducator
ArizonaEducator

Sent letter to all 4 email addresses suggested above.

Tommy Collins
Tommy Collins

It appears Traci Carl must be hoping for a position as Honorary General of the MCSO Media Posse.

Mistalee
Mistalee

I sent a letter to all four as well. Both of the questionable claims by Ms. Meyers are unsourced allegations. When did it become OK to include unsourced allegations in a news story?

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Loading...