Joe Arpaio/SB 1070: Witnesses for Thursday's Congressional Hearing by Representative Raul Grijalva

• <p>Drake, first, we could deport 12 million or even 50 million people anytime we wanted to. This is a leftist and Rino myth, that's constantly repeated. We can go to the moon, (forty one years ago!!), and we can spend trillions on a war that is apparently accomplishing NOTHING, but we cannot afford to build and maintain a fence. I see. More idiocy.</p> <p>I had to get these myths out of the way, before I answer your other notion that we need a path so that workers can come to this country. Excuse me, there already are dozens of programs that allow agriculture and farmers to legally use foreign nationals. The problem is, those programs proscribe certain rules that the farmers and agribusiness doesn't like.</p> <p>The other fallacy to your argument is that, we do not need forty million people to do farm work. We also don't need millions of people that will depress blue collar Americans wages and jobs. You say people that are concerned about this are prejudiced. What exactly are your prejudices?</p>

• <p>What the political right keeps calling open borders is the ability to track who comes into this country to work, and there for properly tax. This causes a strain to our government’s ability to provide services. We will not be able to deport 12 million people, we not afford to build and maintain a fence along the entire US border. What we can do is create a path for workers to come to this country, and tax them appropriately. Who benifits from the lack of this ability Agra-business and others who mostly pays under the table. <br /> The right is praying out your prejudices, to sell you impossible promises, and keep you from actually doing anything about the problem. "Finish the Damn Fence" "Give me a Break" Sheep!</p>

• <p>enonimouse, it could be Chemtrail Karen, or just the run-of-the-mill, East Coast liberal, that has his argyle sweater on backwards. It's so hard to really tell, considering some of the crap I've witnessed from the left. No, I'm not a fanatical conservative. But the left definetly has its share of fanatics that troll away on these blogs.</p>

• <p>"USA should be for Whites only. SB 1070 is sending the message. Vote for the White people's party. Thanks Arizona. This is a good start but we still have more to go. We will win with our votes. I have a message from the Tea Party, "We have come to take our country back."</p> <p><br /> Gee, another satirist. Chemtrail Karen?</p>

• <p>Forget the constitution and bill of rights. This is Arizona. We the country now, folks.</p>

• <p>USA should be for Whites only. SB 1070 is sending the message. Vote for the White people's party. Thanks Arizona. This is a good start but we still have more to go. We will win with our votes. I have a message from the Tea Party, "We have come to take our country back."</p>

• <p>freedom for all, "SOVIET STYLE LAW"? <br /> I would call what Grijalva was doing absolutely fascist. No ones bankrolling Brewer and Arpaio, but 71% of the Arizona public do support them. Grijalva is an American Congressman in name only. In reality he's a racist Mexican nationalist Congressman.</p>

• <p>freedom for all, "SOVIET STYLE LAW"? <br /> I would call what Grijalva was doing absolutely fascist. No ones bankrolling Brewer and Arpaio, but 71% of the Arizona public do support them. Grijalva is an American Congressman in name only. In reality he's a racist Mexican nationalist Congressman.</p>

• <p>Raul Grijalva is an American Congressman, and unlike Jan Brewer, he was actually elected to office. He was absolutely right to call for a boycott, as this Soviet-style law is anathema to everything America represents. Wealthy GOP racists who bankroll crackpots such as Brewer and Arpaio cannot seriously expect Latino customers to patronize their businesses. Get real. I will not spend one cent in any business headquartered in Arizona. Let your fellow racists pay your way. </p>

• <p>Raul Grijalva is the poster boy of a traitor. By his stand on the side of the ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, he violates every word uttered in his oath of office. He should resign immediately and join the line of illegal immigrants headed back to Mexico. This man is ignorant and does not deserve to hold a position in the Government of the Untited States of America.</p>

• <p>Robert says, my kind need to go back to Europe. Well, no Robert, I don't think so. But where do you need to go back to? Heh, you know what Robert, even some of those Hill folks with no front teeth, did more for this country than you probably ever did. Don't be so racist.</p>

• <p>P.S. Turner, Labor unions in the past accepted "legal" immigrants into their ranks, idiot. Those today are corrupt as hell, I know because I belonged to a union for twenty plus years. The unions are abandoning the long time taxpaying, American citizen worker, and that's just great with you isn't it Turner. Your obvious hatred of the American citizen and working stiff, knows no bounds. The unions didn't care about the impact of millions of cheap labor workers that lowered it's members wages, in meat packing, steel, or whatever other business they allowed illegal labor to get into and that's why they are for amnesty. They only care about the dues you moron. You haven't been out in the world much, Turner, have you??</p>

• <p>Turner, your'e doing it again--Projecting. You are the one pathologically(you picked the right word)obsessed with race. How stupid do you think the people on this forum are, even how you sign your name proves my point. </p>

• <p>Bobby, you're the best straw man on here! If you didn't exist, we'd have to invent you to knock you down again. You're also a compulsive liar. Generally labor unions have accepted immigrants into their ranks. Immigrants have long been the backbone of the union movement -- the Irish, the Italians, the Eastern Europeans. Trying to abbreviate and corrupt the union movement into an anti-immigrant cause doesn't really get you anywhere. Nor did you address the issues of the racist, anti-union Bisbee Deportation, or the participation of the unions in the May 29 march (AFLCIO, SEIU, UFCW, etc.) You just hop and skip around, hoping that no one will notice how pathologically obsessed you are with race and how you're avoiding the questions put to you. Sad little troll you are.</p>

• <p>enonimouse, excellent post. It won't cause a hair to stand on the heads of people like Nat Turner and other idiotic open borders leftists, but it might show those with an open mind, what these leftists and people concerned about the rights of, "immigrants", as they call them(foreign nationals illegally in this country)ARE ALL ABOUT. PHONIES WITH AN AGENDA THAT IS TOXIC TO AMERICAN CITIZENS. P.S. But then again, the whole concept of "American citizens" is toxic to these leftist communists at heart.</p>

• <p>Nat Turner, can you really be so idiotic? If you read my post again, you essentially repeated the point of my post, with different words. Of course it was to fight the greedy bosses who advocated and even tried to increase immigration for the purpose of cheap labor. What's the use, you just have an agenda and it's either open borders, or ethnic nationalism. So be it. At least be honest enough to admit it!</p>

• <p>USAdefender1 said:</p> <p>"So let’s take what you provided and what I provided and even if we only took your numbers (I hope you read the whole thing) do you feel comfortable with these numbers and are they acceptable losses. Should a free people endure such loss in exchange for cheap labor?"</p> <p>USA, I agree. <br /> Besides, there are plenty of little girls in mexico crying because daddy is 2000 miles away in a foreign country. Oh, and speaking of cheap labor...</p> <p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-06-09/gm-ford-boost-mexico-output-with-26-a-day-workers-update2-.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-06-09/gm-ford-boost-mexico-output-with-26-a-day-workers-update2-.html</a></p> <p>"Mexico’s share of North American auto production may rise at a quicker pace as General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler Group LLC seek out workers making less than 10 percent of what their U.S. counterparts earn.</p> <p>GM workers in Mexico earn wages and benefits of 340 pesos a day ($26.40) on average, or less than $4 an hour, said Tereso Medina, head of the union for GM’s 5,000 workers in Saltillo, a city that makes one in four Mexican autos. Ford workers in the U.S. earn about $55 an hour with benefits, compared with $50 an hour for Toyota Motor Corp.’s U.S. workers, Lewis Booth, Ford’s chief financial officer, said on a Jan. 28 conference call.</p> <p><br /> Even with the UAW concessions, Mexico remains attractive, Medina said."<br /> </p>

• <p>Nat Turner,</p> <p>Only a Liberal MORON would think of a union in such high regard.</p> <p>Unions will do what is best for the union at any point in time. They are mostly unpatriotic morons who join and will stand by quietly or head out into the streets as paid mobsters and screw the American consumer every time. We need to thank Obama for showing the American people the true colors of the left, the unions and others.</p> <p>Chaves put together the "Wet Line" and SEIU and other accepted illegals for the MONEY and POWER. Not because they care about desegregation. Most of your beloved unions are run by the same whites you hate so much. </p> <p>All in all you Tuner are a LIBERAL MORON RACIST. Yet because you are a leftist you think you’re justified in being one because of ideology which make you a truly ignorant person.</p> <p>USAdefender1</p> <p>P.S. Well I out of town for a couple of days MORONS so play nice. LOL<br /> </p>

• <p>"To protect themselves from the importation of cheap labor,American citizens were forced to create unions."</p> <p>What a colorful perversion history, Bobby! Unions were created to keep "furriners" out? </p> <p>Who filled their ranks? The Irish, the Italians, the Eastern Europeans -- essentially, the Mexicans of their day.</p> <p>Unions were formed to battle the power of the bosses, dumbass, and to collectively bargain for wages. You should read up on the Bisbee Deportation of 1917, Bobby, if you can ever pull your nose out of Mein Kampf and the KKK charter. Nearly 1,200 men -- mostly IWW members, and largely "furriners" -- were rounded up by whites with shotguns and herded out of town on boxcars. </p> <p>Anti-unionism is largely synonymous with the sort of Know Nothing-ism and xenophobia you preach here tirelessly. Who was at the march on the 29th of May? The head of the AFL-CIO. Who backed the march? SEIU and the UFCW. Who have accepted foreign workers into their ranks and were the first to fight for desegregation -- unions. </p> <p>Labor unions were among the biggest opponents of NAFTA but not for the crazy conspiracy reasons you suggest. What a freak you are. You see everything with the blinders of race on and are incapable of realizing that on this blog you've created a cartoon of yourself -- one laughable, pathetic, and totally obsessed with twisting every nuance of history into proving that the white man should dominate. You're too obvious, Bobby. You're a mental child. But keep it coming. We're all laughing atcha.</p>

• <p>CooperG, I agree it's pathetic and the two Republicans behind the idiot holding the baby apparently think so to. I just wonder if you'd find any Democrats critizing the clip above.</p>

• <p>dmbrow, I don't blame it all on those who enter illegally. In all the posts I've given my opinion on regarding the illegal immigration phenomenon, the vast majority critizise those elected officials that are sworn to uphold the laws of the U.S. and won't. Can't say that about Sheriff Arpaio, for one. Your'e right and wrong about the U.S. needing illegal aliens. If you flood the U.S. with cheap labor, you depress the wages of blue collar workers making a living wage. This is exactly what happened when you alluded to the past. To protect themselves from the importation of cheap labor,American citizens were forced to create unions. They did this to protect their wages and jobs. Is this wrong? Should they have been irresponsible and not have thought of their families or their own situation? In those days leftists created th unions. They cared for working stiffs. Not today. Possible a billion or more people would like to come to the U.S. Should we be like the leftist ideologists and say, O.K. let them all in. Really? Seriously, really? What will happen to the U.S. then? It won't be the U.S. any longer, that's what. Engineers will be working for five dollars and hour, bricklayers and carpenters for two dollars and hour and everyone else will be on their own. This is the plan of the elite. This is the meaining of NAFTA, GATT, the NORTH AMERICAN UNION. Don't you get it? You can't have an open border and a sound society. If you could, don't you think other countries would just jump at the chance. Why do some people so desperately want that for the U.S. Just think about it. These open borders people aren't altruitic. Don't believe it for a minute. That isn't their agenda, and the truth is, they couldn't care less about Americans. It was President Clinton, one of the biggest liberals in the nation, that pushed through the NAFTA TREATY, which did a lot to screw up both the U.S. and Mexico. </p> <p>I have read much of the Constitution. I can tell you this, neither Obama, Clinton, Bush, Reagan or Bush's father, seemed to have any use for it. If we were following the Constitution, we wouldn't have a government that neglects the nations borders. We wouldn't have a government that ignores Arizona's critical and dangerous situation with Mexico, a totally corrupt foreign nation with no respect at all for ours. Yet the administration puts Mexico's interests over ours. Whether you want to believe it or not, it IS the people who care about illegal immigration, that care about the U.S. and all of its citizens, NOT THE OPEN BORDERS CROWD. </p>

• <p>enonimouse,</p> <p>Here is a link open border people will like!</p> <p><a href="http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=39031" rel="nofollow">http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=39031</a></p> <p><br /> As for you link;</p> <p>Data Limitations<br /> • The FBI’s IAFIS does not include all arrests and offenses–7 states1 report only the<br /> first arrest and associated offenses to the FBI, subsequent arrest information is<br /> available only through the state’s criminal history database. Further, some law<br /> enforcement agencies do not report information on every arrest to the FBI. Also,<br /> IAFIS does not include minor misdemeanor offenses.<br /> • FBI may reject fingerprint cards that are not readable, and sometimes the submitting<br /> law enforcement agency does not resubmit the card for entry into IAFIS.<br /> • Results of our analysis pertain only to our study population. Results cannot be<br /> generalized to all illegal aliens that may have been arrested and therefore cannot be<br /> interpreted as representing arrest or offense rates for all illegal aliens.</p> <p>Page 12</p> <p><br /> So let’s take what you provided and what I provided and even if we only took your numbers (I hope you read the whole thing) do you feel comfortable with these numbers and are they acceptable losses. Should a free people endure such loss in exchange for cheap labor? What is the monetary worth of our children, family and fellow citizens? </p> <p><br /> There are those like Gilman and Dodo Bird who would probably say the U.S, should endure these losses and more! I on the other hand say NO. So here we are! Stuck in a "Mexican Stand Off" on numbers and sources. One study by a journalist who you may not like and the other a report from the Gov that has made it a point to "NEVER" lie to the American people.</p> <p>USAdefender1</p>

• <p>Pearce, arpaio and thomas have brought so much hatred into the state of Arizona that the damage is incomprehensible. Stir up a hornet's nest and you will get stung. The tin-pot dictators think the people should remain silent??</p>

• <p>Anonymous says:</p> <p>"USADefender<br /> Your stats are wrong. You want to be white so bad you're willing to lie. It must suck when everyone already knows your wife was an "ILLEGAL" "</p> <p>Why do you have to drag a man's family into a combative political blog? He didnt post any link to back up the stats... but either did you to disprove them. So, how do we know youre not a liar? Plus, we know that there are 40,000+ illegal immigrants in FEDERAL prison alone. </p> <p><a href="http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05646r.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05646r.pdf</a></p> <p>Hundreds of thousands of arrests... USAdefenders numbers dont sound too off to me. Now lets see your stats. Im a reasonable person. Im willing to listen. But you have to post some numbers if youre gonna attack his numbers.<br /> </p>

• <p>"Victory is right on. Dump um all down there on the streets. Parents should take the kids with them. That way they can all be homeless together. The legal relatives that are taking care of this girl should also be arrested for aiding and abeting a criminal.</p> <p>Also, it really is the childs fualt. She should'nt be a citizen anyway. She should be punished and forced to be an illegal immigrant in Mexico. Mexico doesn't have no Dream Act. Why should we? Let her fend for herself with the Drug Cartel down there. That will teach her to be born here and think she gets citizenship. She should be punished for speaking English also. What? Are they going to steal our language next? It wouldn't surprise me one bit. They are tuaght to steal at a very young age.</p> <p>USAdender1 also makes a great point. We need to punish someone for those illegals that got dui's. Why not this little girl?</p> <p>Gilboy is a traitor POS pervert for filming this. This kind of thing should never be mentioned again!"</p> <p>This is no place for satire. We are solving the world's problems here. </p>

• <p>USADefender<br /> Your stats are wrong. You want to be white so bad you're willing to lie. It must suck when everyone already knows your wife was an "ILLEGAL" </p>

• <p>Victory is right on. Dump um all down there on the streets. Parents should take the kids with them. That way they can all be homeless together. The legal relatives that are taking care of this girl should also be arrested for aiding and abeting a criminal. </p> <p>Also, it really is the childs fualt. She should'nt be a citizen anyway. She should be punished and forced to be an illegal immigrant in Mexico. Mexico doesn't have no Dream Act. Why should we? Let her fend for herself with the Drug Cartel down there. That will teach her to be born here and think she gets citizenship. She should be punished for speaking English also. What? Are they going to steal our language next? It wouldn't surprise me one bit. They are tuaght to steal at a very young age. </p> <p>USAdender1 also makes a great point. We need to punish someone for those illegals that got dui's. Why not this little girl?</p> <p>Gilboy is a traitor POS pervert for filming this. This kind of thing should never be mentioned again! </p>

• <p>dmbrow,</p> <p>I guess you need to tell the families impacted by these illegal aliens you say "we need"!</p> <p>Tell the family members of 5000 U.S citizens killed annually by illegal drunk drivers! (That’s more dead Americans than those killed in action in two wars)</p> <p>Tell that to the tens of thousands of rape victims.</p> <p>Tell that to the families of thousands of murder victims</p> <p>Tell that to the thousands of assault victims.</p> <p>Get their blessing and then I'll stand right next to you on this one. </p> <p>USAdefender1</p> <p>P.S. Can you set a price on the slaughter of your fellow American.? I tell you what I would rather pay more than to be in the shoes on any of the victims I mentioned above. </p>

• <p>Boo hoo, 'I want my parents back'... you and plemty of other children who's parents couldn't obey THE LAW. Should we just not arrest and lock up anyone who has children?<br /> I certainly hope that if someone breaks into my home they get arrested and jailed and that is exactly how I feel about people who break into my country. They have no problem leaving family behind in their countries to come here so there should be no problem with leaving them behind here to go back to them. I've met some who have families/children in both and their wives don't even know about the other family LOL.</p>

• <p>Bobby...I'm pretty sure they did this in Arizona when they wouldn't recognize MLK day, and they did it in Alabama when they boycotted public transportation. Sometimes you gotta hit people in their pockets to force them to do what's right. History tells us so. It's too bad that you think that even if you are here illegally that those people still don't have rights as humans...and rights because they reside on American soil. Are you telling me an American murderer deserves better treatment then someone working...paying taxes, working, providing for their families whose here illegally? According to you they both break the law, but even prisoners and those suspected of committing a crime have rights whether you like it or not. So before you harp on about being an American, understand what it means to be one. Have you even read the consitution? Educate yourself before you get on the blog talking emotional nonsense! Also if there were no illegals do you know how much we'd be spending on produce as consumers! Like it or not our economy depends on cheap labor that Americans won't do for such low wages! Face it...we need them! After we had free labor (slavery) we depended on cheap labor (immigrants) and its still that way! We are just as much to blame, we enjoy the benefits of the cheap labor and exploitation at every chance we get so you can't blame it all on those who enter illegally.</p>

• <p>Freedom Fighter says:</p> <p>"Bobby.- Fuck you..fuck you...fuck you..."</p> <p>Freedom Fighter says:</p> <p>"Bobby.- seriously...fuck you.."</p> <p><br /> Thank you for your contribution to the debate. Care to elaborate on these comments? I think you make some excellent points here, but I need some clarification on the third 'fuck you'. Maybe you could site the line from bobby's posts that the 'fuck you' refers to... or Lemons does the 'thinking', you do the fighting?</p> <p>'Seriously'.... you seem to hate bobby, but I think it's fair to at least pay him the respect of directly addressing what ticked you off so much. Why post 'fuck you'? Did you improve the quality of the debate with 'fuck you'? Bobby gets a lot of shit, but he has a philosophy and attempts to back it up with logic and reason. You might think it is motivated by 'hate', but reason deserve the respect of reason. If youre going to attack him, be respectful of the proposition present in the words, even if you find it impossible to respect the speaker. </p>

• <p>Quit snivelling you morons. I fool most of the people most of the time. So while you guys snivel, i'll still be flinging those mexicans over the border.</p>

• <p>Judging by the E-mails, texts, IMs, and phone calls, The Associates almost unanimously support and applaud blogger "Bobby" for his rightful criticism of RAUL GRIJALVA. Here's an excerpt from a Mesa Associate's E-mail,</p> <p>"Thanks for these links to The Fat Fucktard's blog. This dude "Bobby" is really slamming the pro-illegal crowd and calling out Raul "La Raza" Grijalva, a lowlife piece of shit.</p> <p>Muerte a La Raza."</p> <p>What's that mean - is it Death to La Raza?" This Associate really means business<br /> and sounds like he thinks Raul is an enemy combatant or something.</p> <p>Check out www.badphoenixcops.blogspot.com for the latest on Phoenix police and government corruption. That's www.badphoenixcops.com - where the truth hurts.</p> <p>Please send your comments, feedback, information, and documentation to cocozzamail@gmail.com. Thanks All! We're getting some VERY USEFUL goods and evidence.</p> <p>HMG on the blog - online and on time.</p> <p><br /> </p>

• <p>To<br /> Bobby</p> <p>Your kind need to go back to europe. <br /> They are in need off your kind, hill<br /> folks with no front teeth.</p>

• <p>Bobby: If you want to really be disgusted about some politician using babies as props for political purposes, you should watch this YouTube video.</p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9y9lgu8PTI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9y9lgu8PTI</a> </p>

• <p>Bobby.- seriously...fuck you..</p>

• <p>Bobby.- Fuck you..fuck you...fuck you...</p>

• <p>Let's ask the children of the victims of <a href="http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/fugitives/vc/murders/vc_murders.htm" rel="nofollow">these lawbreakers</a> how uncontrolled immigration has affected their lives.</p>

• <p>Gilman you are a sick, sick man. To do that to that little girl. And why is it in your videos you exploit children for your agendas? That's what cowards do. And there is a reason why C-Span is not covering it, because it is not news worthy. I am willing to bet that some of these witnesses have no credibility(just like Lemons' reporting) or half of their crap is made up. Hey Lemons where is your article on the Border Patrol agent who had to fend for his life yesterday because multiple illegals who were trying to cross the border attacked him? Unfortunately a 14 year old boy lost his life. But when you allow your children attack federal officers then you are taking a chance with their lives. Anyways Gilman you should be ashamed of yourself for being the predator that you are.</p>

• <p>The girl's parents should ask for deportation so they can be with their daughter. I have two kids and I would never risk being separated from them by breaking the laws of any country.</p> <p>Rather than being mad at Obama, everyone should be furious at this girl's parents for putting their family at risk.</p> <p>Stop blaming other people for the consequences of your own actions.</p>

• <p>This is a truly disgusting thing, to use this poor little girl as propaganda. I feel bad for her, but the person responsible for her tears is not sheriff Joe. Its her parents for bringing her along during the commission of a crime, thinking that all they would have to do to get away with it would be to appeal to the emotions that it would cause.<br /> The parents of this little girl are despicable.</p>

• <p>The most I can say about the little girl crying is that, yes, that's what ALL little kids do when their parents get arrested. Kids cry when that happens, whether their parents are citizens or not, whether their parents are latinos, asians, whites, blacks,etc. So what's supposed to be the big surprise here? Does it mean illegal immigration is right and the borders should immediately be thrown open? Does it mean the parents can do anything they want to, and get excused from doing something wrong the moment their daughter cries? What's the lesson exactly? You tell me. I honestly want to know.</p>

• <p>While it is sad to see this little girl cry I only wonder where Gilboy, Dodo Bird and rest of the Liberal MORONS are when a U.S. citizen of any color is killed by illegal drunk drivers. I guess they think that U.S. citizen children don’t bleed, cry or Die!</p> <p>If you notice Gilboy continually brings the little girl in closer and closer to get the tears on tape. This moron is a deliberate cold hearted person with no feeling for people much less children. He exploits these people for his anarchist ideals and nothing more. May I also add that only a truly sick person would coach a child like he does. I have seen other videos when he films children and the same story. Liberal MORONS have no morals and this is proof positive. </p> <p><br /> USAdefender1</p> <p>P.S. Grijalva is a MORON who needs to lay of the booze.<br /> </p>

• <p>Polymarchs--"undocumented community"? Could you explain to us what happened to the documents? Were they lost? Get it right. The illegal alien "community". Illegal alien is the official term used in U.S. IMMIGRATION LAW. Just thought you'd like to know that. Not really.</p>

• <p>This staged stuff with little children is an example of the depraved depths that leftists will go to to acheive their agenda of open borders and the remaking of the U.S. into what they imagine it should be. I never hear the left upset over the children left behind when their American parents get arrested,etc. The ACLU never shows up, no human rights groups, La Raza and Lulac are absent, etc. </p>

• <p>Arpaio and Pearce, disgraces of the human rcae.<br /> </p>

• <p>Raul Grijalva is a LA RAZA GANGSTA, was probably a member of the racist organization MECHA, in school, and he is basically a fifth columinist for Mexico's interests. He called for a boycott of the businesses Americans own and make their living by in Arizona, and yet he is supposed to be a "representative" of these folks. His actions speak louder than his words and belie his true loyalties. Now he continues his "fifth columnist" for Mexico activities, by messing with a United States law officer. Mark my words, this is going to come back at this clown. He's a crook and will be exposed sooner or later. How do I know he's a crook? What, your'e kidding. He has all the signs of a crook. He feels empowered, entitled, above the law, and is so ignorant he doesn't even hide the fact.</p>

• <p>Raul Grijalva is a Racist LA RAZA gangster, was probably in MECHA at one time, and is no representative of American citizens. He is a representative of Mexican nationals illegally in this country--but not of American citizens. Case closed. No sane person, certainly no "REPRESENTATIVE OF AMERICAN CITIZENS" calls for a boycott of their businesses because of some personal agenda. That is up to the citizens not TRAITOR GRIJALVA. Now he continues his fifth column activities for MExico, by messing with a U.S. law enforcement Sheriff. SCREW THIS TRAITOR!! </p>

• <p>Funny, the Sheriff had to chime in on TV today about the congressional hearing taking place to discuss his activities.</p> <p>Sad part is, it doesn't matter in the least what the sheriff had to say. His 'Opinion' here does not mean anything at all.</p> <p>I suppose this further proves his self centered, egotistical nature. Why did he think anyone would care what he said about the DC hearing?</p> <p>I believe it was just another opportunity to be on TV in his badly tailored suit, if it was tailored, which probably came out of the taxpayers pockets.</p> <p>The sheriff probably used one of the MCSO credit cards to buy that suit. </p> <p>I wonder what he has been saving the $1Million in cash for? He probably has it tucked under his mattress or sewn into his clothing. If it's the latter that would explain the need for personal security. :P</p>

• <p>This is really sad, somebody has to stop this KKKLOWN and his whole gang.</p> <p>This is the first time I post in this site, but I read many hate post supporting these kind of actions against the undocumented community.</p> <p>I think there are many more important things to do than this raids, such as the oil spill, economy, etc.</p> <p>It seems like many people don't care about money, despite this new law SB-1070 there are no enough jobs, bussiness are closing or are about to close.</p> <p>There are more to come when the Sb 1070 comes in effect next July 29th, economy will be worst, more forclosures, bussines in bankruptcy, etc.</p> <p>The USA should erase the phrase "In God we trust" from his currency because God is no longer with this (once) great nation.</p> <p>"Let's be part of the solution, not the problem"</p>

• <p>About the only thing I disagree with is not inviting Sheriff Schmoe out, even if you know he will decline. There's nothing like hoisting a moron by his own petards.</p>

TotalComments: 51